Once python3-m2crypto is in Debian, I will port oz to python3.
/Simon
> 13 aug. 2019 kl. 21:46 skrev Thomas Goirand :
>
>> On 8/13/19 12:38 PM, peter green wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I've been looking at various python 2 cruft packages (packages no longer
>> built by the corresponding source packages)
On 8/13/19 3:30 PM, peter green wrote:
> IMO python-monotonic should be reinstated until it's reverse
> dependencies are sorted out.
There's now only oz, googleapi and duplicity. The last 2 both have Py3
support upstream in a newer version. Let's fix these, as I fixed all the
rest already. If
On 8/13/19 12:38 PM, peter green wrote:
> python-fasteners (has rdeps)
> python-oauth2client (via python-fasteners)
FYI, I removed Python 2 support from these 2 today! :)
Hopefully, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) will do the work for googleapi, and
then we'll get another chain of Py2 removed. :)
On 8/13/19 12:38 PM, peter green wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been looking at various python 2 cruft packages (packages no longer
> built by the corresponding source packages) and why they can't be
> cleaned up, I have been looking in a derivative but many of my results
> are also relevant to debian
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 02:00:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Hi, Python folks.
>
> I think help is needed regarding
>
> #932584 python-pydoctor: Epydoc will be removed
>
> It seems to be languishing rather. What I don't understand is why
> pydoctor depends on epydoc given that, in the
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:05:33AM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> > Yes, this is the third email on this in the last month, previous two
> > didn't get any replies.
>
> Sorry I didn't mean to anger you or be disrespectful in any way. My
> apologies if I did.
I wasn't angered, the second of those
Hi Andrey,
Thanks for your reply.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:40 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Yes, this is the third email on this in the last month, previous two
> didn't get any replies.
Sorry I didn't mean to anger you or be disrespectful in any way. My
apologies if I did.
I was off the
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:16:28AM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> While tidying up some packages before taking some time off I realized
> that some packages like django-tables had binary packages that took
> the convention of creating -doc packages using -doc (a
> very long time ago).
>
> The
On 13.08.19 15:30, peter green wrote:
> IMO python-monotonic should be reinstated until it's reverse dependencies are
> sorted out.
I agree with that.
(note for people reading on bug 934333, the start of this thread can be found
at https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/08/msg00070.html )
On 13/08/2019 11:54, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
This is worrying, a package with revdeps shouldn't have been dropped.
AIUI a "go cleanly" approach
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:38:33AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> One package that stood out from the rest was python-monotonic.
> python-monotonic is maintained by the Debian openstack team, but it doesn't
> seem to be in any way openstack specific, nor does upstream seem to have
> dropped
Hi
I've been looking at various python 2 cruft packages (packages no longer built
by the corresponding source packages) and why they can't be cleaned up, I have
been looking in a derivative but many of my results are also relevant to debian
proper. Where relevant I have been filing bugs
Hi,
po 12. 8. 2019 v 23:19 odesílatel Moritz Mühlenhoff napsal:
> Sure, I've read the policy and acking it, my Salsa login is "jmm".
>
welcome :)
--
Best regards
Ondřej Nový
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
* Package name: python-aioftp
Version : 0.10.1
Upstream Author : pohmelie
* URL : https://github.com/aio-libs/aioftp
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : ftp client/server library
14 matches
Mail list logo
