Proposal on how to proceed with Python 2 removal from bullseye

Dear all, TL;DR: as the subject suggests, proposal included, although not fully aligned with others. On 08-12-2019 20:55, Sandro Tosi wrote: > there seems to be disagreement on how to proceed, so for the time > being i suspended the severity bump part of the py2removal tracking > script. let me

Re: RFS [RC] jsonpickle, python-serverfiles

both sponsored, thanks for your contribution to Debian! On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 3:10 AM Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: > > Hello, > > Can someone please do an upload of jsonpickle? It is marked for > autoremoval on 19 January. This update fixes the issue, it also updates > to the latest upstream

Re: Bug#943785: RFS: python-pyjsparser (ITP bug #943785)

Hi Nick, have you already found time to look into the revised packaging described in [0] and [1]? Cheers, Peter [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/11/msg00048.html [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/11/msg00106.html

RFS [RC] jsonpickle, python-serverfiles

Hello, Can someone please do an upload of jsonpickle? It is marked for autoremoval on 19 January. This update fixes the issue, it also updates to the latest upstream release. https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/jsonpickle I did the same on python-serverfiles, removed an rc bug and