libgcc_s breakage Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Matthias Klose wrote: On 2/3/20 8:22 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: >> Meanwhile, multiple packages seem to FTBFS on s390x with the new libgcc_s (I've just opened the bug for that, so no bug number known yet), which is going to limit the ability to get things into testing. please retry your packag

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-03 Thread Matthias Klose
On 2/3/20 8:22 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 02 Feb 2020 at 09:35:04 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I think this is now in shape to be started. > > Please can this wait until the remaining bits of the libffi7 transition > and the restructuring of the libgcc_s packaging have settled down? >

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-03 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 02 Feb 2020 at 09:35:04 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > I think this is now in shape to be started. Please can this wait until the remaining bits of the libffi7 transition and the restructuring of the libgcc_s packaging have settled down? I'm still trying to sort out the missing Breaks aro

RE:application and private module extension

2020-02-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Indded sorry for the noise Fredric

Re: application and private module extension

2020-02-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 02:32:22PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, > > I am packaging a python application . So I dediced to put the module under > the private directory > > /usr/share/ > > but this software contain a cython extension. > > So at the end I have a lintian Error d

application and private module extension

2020-02-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I am packaging a python application . So I dediced to put the module under the private directory /usr/share/ but this software contain a cython extension. So at the end I have a lintian Error due to binary file under /usr/share. What is the best soltuion when we need to package a so