Re: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

2021-10-25 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/25/21 8:18 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > However, it would be still nice to remove nose at some future point, maybe > before Bookworm release. Will do, probably for the next version of OpenStack (last one made me update 220 packages: that's a good way to review everything). > I'm impressed

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian: current state

2021-10-25 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2021-10-25 14 h 04, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Mathias Behrle: " PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian: current state" (Mon, 25 > Oct 2021 19:45:39 +0200): > >> Hi all, >> >> before doing something nasty I would like to hear if >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/06/msg2.html >> is

Re: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

2021-10-25 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Thomas and all! On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:53:19PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I'm referenced for 55 packages. Please don't force me to do this right > away, that's too much work. I very much would prefer if we could have a > smoother transition. > > Note that it's possible that for

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian: current state

2021-10-25 Thread Mathias Behrle
* Mathias Behrle: " PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian: current state" (Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:45:39 +0200): > Hi all, > > before doing something nasty I would like to hear if > https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/06/msg2.html > is still valid? JFTR I forgot to mention the background

PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian: current state

2021-10-25 Thread Mathias Behrle
Hi all, before doing something nasty I would like to hear if https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/06/msg2.html is still valid? Thanks for your feedback, Mathias -- Mathias Behrle PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6 AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6