Hi Andrius
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 07:13, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Am I right that whichever the choice, there will be only one supported
> Python version in bookworm?
Yes, I believe that was the decision made at DebConf 22.
> I believe there are many packages that will
> FTBFS with Python 3.11 a
On 2022-12-12 18 h 51, Graham Inggs wrote:
Dear Python Team
Looking at the current state of the 'adding Python 3.11 as a supported
version' transition [1], the tracker [2] shows only 12 red packages
(excluding unknowns and packages not in testing) remaining, copied
below for reference.
We belie
Hi Graham,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:51:11PM +, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Dear Python Team
>
> Looking at the current state of the 'adding Python 3.11 as a supported
> version' transition [1], the tracker [2] shows only 12 red packages
> (excluding unknowns and packages not in testing) remaining
Hi all,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 10:15:37AM +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
> One remaining problem is the unmaintained nose package, which is not
> compatible with Python 3.11 and still a dependency of 200+ packages,
> including ~40 key packages [1]. I've seen that crusoe has done some work
> patching
Am 13.12.2022 10:15 schrieb Timo Röhling:
One remaining problem is the unmaintained nose package
[...]
done some work patching up nose
This question is just for my learning: Why is nose patched? Upstream
nose is unmaintained for years.
I understand that you cannot drop nose from Debian in th
* Graham Inggs [2022-12-12 23:51]:
with the bookworm transition freeze only one month away [5], we'd like
to hear from the Python Team within the next week whether they wish to
proceed with Python 3.11 being the only supported version for bookworm
[...]
Should it be the former, we'd like an unde
6 matches
Mail list logo
