On 10.12.23 14:06, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition
reasonably soon.
Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required
for Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to be
done first?
These are bro
On 10.12.23 21:32, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 09:30:03PM +0100, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
I find that there's also a significant issue with relying on
cython3-legacy: it conflicts with cython3, meaning that it will be
impossible to simultaneously install packages dependi
On 2023-12-10 21:55, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
Hi Rebecca, Julian and all science minded pythonistas of debian, great
and small!
3.) The following one-liner suggests 44 debian
packages might be affected by the breaks
Rebecca said would be caused by pandas 2.x:
$ for s in augur c
Hi Rebecca, Julian and all science minded pythonistas of debian, great and
small!
I like your correspondence about upgrading from
version 1.5 of pandas to 2.1.
It's open, scientific and explores the ideal of
proceeding wisely in a matter of public interest.
My humble thoughts are:
1.) Rebecca:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 09:30:03PM +0100, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > I find that there's also a significant issue with relying on
> > cython3-legacy: it conflicts with cython3, meaning that it will be
> > impossible to simultaneously install packages depending on cython3 and
> > cython3-legacy.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 08:12:40PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 04:23:46PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> > As part of preparing for Python 3.12 in Debian, I've uploaded cython 3
> > to experimental.
> > [...]
> >
> > So, that's 71 regressions with cython3. dd-list below.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 01:06:01PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition reasonably
> soon.
>
> Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required for
> Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to be
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 04:23:46PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> As part of preparing for Python 3.12 in Debian, I've uploaded cython 3
> to experimental.
> [...]
>
> So, that's 71 regressions with cython3. dd-list below. Please help us
> port to cython 3. If this isn't possible, Graham is prepar
I'd like to move forward with the pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 transition
reasonably soon.
Given that pandas 2.x is *not* required for Python 3.12 (but is required
for Cython 3.0), should we wait for the Python 3.12 transition to be
done first?
These are broken by pandas 2.x and have a possible (but un
9 matches
Mail list logo
