Re: upload sphinx-autoapi

On 2020-10-21 15:37+0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: Hi Felix, On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 4:04 PM Félix Sipma wrote: I updated the package to the last upstream version, and it includes a few fixes. I'd appreciate if I could be given upload rights, that would help maintaining the package. Given you

Re: upload sphinx-autoapi

If someone could have a look... On 2020-10-10 12:27+0200, Félix Sipma wrote: Hi, Could someone upload sphinx-autoapi 1.5.1-1? https://mentors.debian.net/package/sphinx-autoapi/ https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sphinx-autoapi/sphinx-autoapi_1.5.1-1.dsc I updated the package

upload sphinx-autoapi

Hi, Could someone upload sphinx-autoapi 1.5.1-1? https://mentors.debian.net/package/sphinx-autoapi/ https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sphinx-autoapi/sphinx-autoapi_1.5.1-1.dsc I updated the package to the last upstream version, and it includes a few fixes. I'd appreciate

Re: todoman_3.7.0-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Sandro also noted it, and it's already fixed. Thanks, -- Félix signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Note that changing the address triggers a lintian warning: W: khard source: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Python Applications Packaging Team -- Félix signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Sorry, I thought this had been updated! -- Félix signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [felix+deb...@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]]

On 2020-04-20 21:53+0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: Well, I'm just trying to sponsor what you've uploaded to mentors, and so far, it didn't work (I just tried). Please try downloading the .dsc with dget and try yourself. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) How did you build the package? I just tried

Re: [felix+deb...@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]]

On 2020-04-20 16:16+0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 4/20/20 2:45 PM, Félix Sipma wrote: On 2020-04-20 12:06+0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: I'm not sure, the doc still accounts for half of the package. But let's pretend it's ok. We are talking about 80KB for the whole package. If it's

Re: [felix+deb...@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]]

On 2020-04-20 12:06+0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: I'm not sure, the doc still accounts for half of the package. But let's pretend it's ok. We are talking about 80KB for the whole package. If it's not a blocker for you I prefer keeping it like that. Now, the package contains a test suite.

Re: [felix+deb...@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]]

On 2020-04-19 23:18+0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: Better not symlink anything manually but use dh_sphinxdoc which will do it automatically: - Replace “--with python3” with “--with python3,sphinxdoc” in debian/rules. - Make python-sphinx-autoapi-doc depend on ${sphinxdoc:Depends}. - Drop

Re: [felix+deb...@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]]

On 2020-04-19 21:50+0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 4/19/20 5:24 PM, Félix Sipma wrote: I hope I fixed the issues you found Not really... :( Let's try again, then... Now the package is 2.7 MB, out of which the extracted library is only 380 KB. Now, the extracted documentation is 3.5 MB

Re: [felix+deb...@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]]

On 2020-04-19 15:39+, Scott Kitterman wrote: As a member of the FTP Team, I see this situation from time to time. It's usually not a serious problem, but I agree with Zigo on this. Where it becomes problematic is when code in debian/ becomes intermingled with the installed upstream code.

Re: [felix+deb...@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]]

Felix, Thanks for working on this. Here's my comments. I'm sorry that there's a lot to say on what you did... :/ On 4/19/20 11:53 AM, Félix Sipma wrote: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sphinx-autoapi/sphinx-autoapi_1.2.1-1.dsc Looking at your debian/copyright, I'd

[felix+deb...@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]]

Hi, Nobody answered on mentors, so I'm trying debian-python... If someone could have a look to this package and push it to the NEW queue, it would allow me to get a new version of khard in sid. Thanks, -- Félix --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear

Re: package_data in python package

On 2019-10-28 11:15-0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, October 28, 2019 11:02:40 AM EDT Félix Sipma wrote: >> On 2019-10-28 10:44-0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> It's the way setuptools works. Looking at the current upstream >>> recommendatio

Re: package_data in python package

On 2019-10-28 10:44-0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > It's the way setuptools works. Looking at the current upstream > recommendations: > > https://python-packaging.readthedocs.io/en/latest/non-code-files.html > > your solution seems correct. Hi Scott, Thanks for your message. I'm not sure I

package_data in python package

Hi, I have a problem with package_data files in a package ("khard", which is not currently under the debian-python umbrella but it is on my todo list to transfer it, I just didn't find the time yet) not getting installed. I submitted an error upstream,

joining PAPT

Hi, I'm already a member of DPMT, but I'd like to join PAPT to put some of the packages I maintain there (todoman and khard, and I still plan to work on these), and help in at least khal packaging. I still agree to follow the team policy. My login on salsa is felix-guest. Cheers,

new version of python-icalendar

Hi, I pushed the latest release of python-icalendar (with an upstream fix to #908498 and with various fixes in the packaging) to salsa and uploaded it to ftp-master. I forgot I did not have the permissions to upload this package, so this failed. Could someone upload it for me? I put it on

Re: Move to salsa? Team structure preview ready

Hi, Do you plan changing the Vcs-fields for all packages automatically? I also noticed that this package: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/twodict is not accessible on salsa (and neither is accessible on alioth anymore). Is this expected? Thanks! signature.asc Description: PGP

salsa.debian.org

Hi, Is it intended to create an organisation for Python packaging soon? I'm asking because I'd like to start the packaging of a new module (python-twodict). Thanks, -- Félix signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: sphinx-autorun/1.0.4-1 [ITP]

sphinx-autorun is now updated to 1.1.0-1 on mentors. Could someone have a look to this package? I can't finish the packaging of todoman because of this build dependency... Thanks! On 2017-07-25 18:45+0200, Félix Sipma wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Followup-For: Bug #863982

Re: RFS: sphinx-autorun/1.0.4-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #863982 I updated the package on mentors to 1.0.4-1. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign

RFS: sphinx-autorun/1.0.3-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for "sphinx-autorun": sphinx-autorun - Code execution extension for Sphinx Package name: sphinx-autorun Version: 1.0.3-1 Upstream Author: Hugo Osvaldo Barrera Homepage:

Re: request to join the DPMT

On 2017-05-25 08:56+0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Félix Sipma, 2017-05-18] >> I'd like to package and maintain sphinx-autorun >> https://github.com/hobarrera/sphinx-autorun which is needed to build another >> ITP of mine, todoman. It would be nice if I could do this in t

request to join the DPMT

Hi, I'd like to package and maintain sphinx-autorun https://github.com/hobarrera/sphinx-autorun which is needed to build another ITP of mine, todoman. It would be nice if I could do this in the DPMT. My alioth login is gueux-guest. I just subscribed to debian-python@lists.debian.org. I have