Re: dfsg suffix

Twas brillig at 20:51:49 25.10.2010 UTC+03 when techto...@gmail.com did gyre and gimble: at> Does that mean that I need to figure out why tarball was repacked at> and manually repack it again with the same changes to do new at> release? http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/t/trac-b

Re: Quick analysis of the Python dist-packages transition

Twas brillig at 21:18:16 18.09.2009 UTC+02 when j...@debian.org did gyre and gimble: JM> Mikhail Gusarov JM>python-pytils Fixed and passed to Piotr for sponsoring. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/ pgpIJha5KBPcs.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

Twas brillig at 16:42:41 08.09.2009 UTC+02 when pi...@debian.org did gyre and gimble: PO> I.e. using build dependencies to determine[1] requested Python PO> versions. Joss mentioned it on #debian-python recently so I guess PO> he's willing to remove pyversions... Sounds good, getting rid of

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

Twas brillig at 03:00:53 08.09.2009 UTC-07 when vor...@debian.org did gyre and gimble: SL> So Steve went here for whining, not for fixing the situation. How sad :( -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/ pgpxrPkrnQu1T.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

Twas brillig at 02:42:09 08.09.2009 UTC-07 when vor...@debian.org did gyre and gimble: SL> Spare me your ignorant preaching and go read the mailing list SL> archives. Mailing list archives are not documentation. SL> It once lived at - SL> be

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

Twas brillig at 09:35:04 08.09.2009 UTC+01 when floris.bruynoo...@gmail.com did gyre and gimble: >> Is this design and rationale written down somewhere? It's hard to >> follow policy which contains completely opaque requirements. FB> I recall watching a video of that BoF, so it should be pos

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

Twas brillig at 20:21:31 07.09.2009 UTC-07 when vor...@debian.org did gyre and gimble: >> SL> They were part of the design that came out of the python >> SL> packaging BoF in DebConf 6 that you then proceeded to ignore >> SL> entirely. >> Is this design and rationale written down somewhe

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

Twas brillig at 11:37:50 07.09.2009 UTC-07 when vor...@debian.org did gyre and gimble: SL> They were part of the design that came out of the python packaging SL> BoF in DebConf 6 that you then proceeded to ignore entirely. Is this design and rationale written down somewhere? It's hard to foll

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

Twas brillig at 16:44:09 05.09.2009 UTC-07 when ludovico.cave...@gmail.com did gyre and gimble: >> LC> What is the best practice? >> Looks like it is /usr/share/doc/python-support/README.gz. LC> That's what I needed! and it was in a pretty obvious location :( Wiki is much more prominent (a

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

Twas brillig at 16:07:36 05.09.2009 UTC-07 when ludovico.cave...@gmail.com did gyre and gimble: LC> What is the best practice? Looks like it is /usr/share/doc/python-support/README.gz. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/ pgpvbgrOIwafJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Pkg-trac-devel] Trac team almost dead?

Twas brillig at 12:21:21 28.08.2009 UTC+02 when deba...@debian.org did gyre and gimble: WMB> Typical plugins are installed into Trac directories, ? There are two modes of installation: putting the .egg to the concrete Trac instance and installing it site-wide in the PYTHONPATH. You're probabl

Re: Trac team almost dead?

Twas brillig at 12:08:21 28.08.2009 UTC+02 when pi...@debian.org did gyre and gimble: PO> question is: are these plugins installed in trac's directory or do PO> they "import trac"? import. Additionally Trac supports installing plugins into the instances. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

Twas brillig at 19:13:19 21.03.2007 UTC-07 when Steve Langasek did gyre and gimble: SL> You implemented a tool that *ignored* some of the use cases that went into SL> the initial policy, among them the case for 'current'. Please, give us a link to the *written* use cases, so we can map them t

Re: Deploying/packaging Pylons projects

Twas brillig at 16:42:42 05.03.2007 UTC+01 when Christoph Haas did gyre and gimble: CH> I already thought about some magical "egg-buildpackage" script CH> that creates a proper Debian package from an egg so it can be CH> deployed the Debian way. Yep, that's the only reliable solution, but no

Re: Outdated Python-related packages in Debian

You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: RH> If anyone updates some of theses packages, please invite the maintainers RH> to join the "Debian Python Modules Team". RH> http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org Please add me. My python-openid, python-yadis and python-urljr are sitting in NEW right now. Al