Le 04/01/2024 à 11:51, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
On 1/4/24 00:30, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
The better solution is to remove python3-future altogether.
I very much agree with this. Most of the time, it's simply patching out
stuff like:
from __future__ import
Not quite:
- __future__
On 1/4/24 00:30, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
Le lun. 11 déc. 2023 à 16:43, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Control: tags -1 help
[Bug #1056419 in CC since the issue seems to be caused by python-future]
Hi Vincent,
I tried to upgrade python-future to the latest upstream version in the
hope that this
Hi,
Thank you very much for looking into this, it is much appreciated and you can
go ahead with the upload.
Ana
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024, at 12:19 PM, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Le jeu. 4 janv. 2024 à 07:48, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>> > @Vincent: this one package "gtextfsm" is yours
>> > do you
ok for me
- Le 4 Jan 24, à 13:19, Alexandre Detiste alexandre.deti...@gmail.com a
écrit :
> Le jeu. 4 janv. 2024 à 07:48, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>> > @Vincent: this one package "gtextfsm" is yours
>> > do you green light an upload ?
>>
>> If you ask me the package is team maintained and a
Le jeu. 4 janv. 2024 à 07:48, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > @Vincent: this one package "gtextfsm" is yours
> > do you green light an upload ?
>
> If you ask me the package is team maintained and a "Team upload"
> should be fine.
Hi, I just try to follow the rules I agreed on last month.
Hi Alexandre,
Am Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:30:21AM +0100 schrieb Alexandre Detiste:
>
> There might be some nmu needed too if maintainers don't react.
>
> @Vincent: this one package "gtextfsm" is yours
> do you green light an upload ?
If you ask me the package is team maintained and a "Team
On 2024-01-04 00:30, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
@Vincent: this one package "gtextfsm" is yours
do you green light an upload ?
Yes.
Le lun. 11 déc. 2023 à 16:43, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> [Bug #1056419 in CC since the issue seems to be caused by python-future]
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> I tried to upgrade python-future to the latest upstream version in the
> hope that this would solve the issue reported in
Hi Alexandre,
Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:18:16PM +0100 schrieb Alexandre Detiste:
> > https://github.com/lebigot/uncertainties/releases/tag/3.1.7
>
> +1
OK.
> > Also we should probably get rid of python-future at some point.
>
> I removed it from three games this week-end
> and filled 6 more
Le lun. 11 déc. 2023 à 17:02, Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit :
> I think the right thing here is to package the new uncertainties version
> which drops the past import:
>
> https://github.com/lebigot/uncertainties/releases/tag/3.1.7
+1
> Also we should probably get rid of python-future at some
Hi Andreas,
* Andreas Tille [2023-12-11 16:42]:
Control: tags -1 help
[Bug #1056419 in CC since the issue seems to be caused by python-future]
Hi Vincent,
I tried to upgrade python-future to the latest upstream version in the
hope that this would solve the issue reported in bug #1042244.
Control: tags -1 help
[Bug #1056419 in CC since the issue seems to be caused by python-future]
Hi Vincent,
I tried to upgrade python-future to the latest upstream version in the
hope that this would solve the issue reported in bug #1042244.
Unfortunately this is not the case and now with
12 matches
Mail list logo