Re: [RFS]: python-py{ode,epl}

2006-06-23 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
> "all" is not a package, it's a (pseudo) version, you can't use ouh... indeed... pseudo-version... That helps ;-) > "version (>= version)" syntax. > For arch indep packages use just "all" or ">= 2.3" > For arch dep packages, you need to add "any" part > ("any", "any, >=2.3", "any, >=2.3, <<2.5",

Re: [RFS]: python-py{ode,epl}

2006-06-23 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Piotr Ozarowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > For arch dep packages, you need to add "any" part > ("any", "any, >=2.3", "any, >=2.3, <<2.5", ...) heh, you need to add "any" to Architecture header, not to XS-Python-Version of course -- -=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pg

Re: [RFS]: python-py{ode,epl}

2006-06-23 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > I'm not a DD, but thats my 2 cents after looking at diff file: You > > can't use "all (>=2.3)" in XS-Python-Version header, it has to be: > > "all, >=2.3" if you want to support all python versions >= 2.3 > yikes! Thank you for warning me. Although I thin

Re: [RFS]: python-py{ode,epl}

2006-06-23 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
> I'm not a DD, but thats my 2 cents after looking at diff file: You > can't use "all (>=2.3)" in XS-Python-Version header, it has to be: > "all, >=2.3" if you want to support all python versions >= 2.3 yikes! Thank you for warning me. Although I think it is quite in dissonance with the rest of con