Adam McKenna writes:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 12:55:59AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
reopen 128531
thanks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam D. McKenna)
Changes:
tmda (0.46-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* Package split into 3 packages to help
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 08:06:35AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Adam McKenna writes:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 12:55:59AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
reopen 128531
thanks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam D. McKenna)
Changes:
tmda (0.46-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:41:05PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
A program run by a user will never be able to write out the .py[co] files so
the files MUST be generated by the postinst which has root privs. Also we can
not expect the user to be running /usr mount rw except when a package
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 07:57:52AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
|
| What do you have against giving the user optimizations?
|
| Absolutely nothing, but I don't see why this needs to be done outside of
| the package management system.
|
| I fail to see why these files need to be known
On 20-Feb-2002 dman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 07:57:52AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
|
| What do you have against giving the user optimizations?
|
| Absolutely nothing, but I don't see why this needs to be done outside of
| the package management system.
|
| I fail to see why
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 07:57:52AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
What do you have against giving the user optimizations?
Absolutely nothing, but I don't see why this needs to be done outside of
the package management system.
I fail to see why these files need to be known by
They should be known by dpkg because they're part of the package. It's
impossible to support more than just the currently installed versions anyway.
Once a new version of python is added, the package will still need to be
updated or at least reinstalled to compile the modules for the new
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:19:57AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
They should be known by dpkg because they're part of the package. It's
impossible to support more than just the currently installed versions
anyway.
Once a new version of python is added, the package will still need
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:08:22AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
|
| On 20-Feb-2002 dman wrote:
| On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 07:57:52AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
| |
| | What do you have against giving the user optimizations?
| |
| | Absolutely nothing, but I don't see why this
9 matches
Mail list logo
