Florent Rougon writes:
Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
python2.1 (2.1.3-3) from sid
py2texi.el is a generated file
it is included in debian/patches/info-docs.dpatch
the fixinfo.el is replaced by it, fixinfo.el is not run.
OK, py2texi and fixinfo have nothing in common.
Converting a hack to another hack with no strong reason nor fun is not
exactly what I dream of every night.
So, I am not sure that such a conversion would be worth the time spent.
If despite all of this you still want to tackle on this task and have
some ELisp questions (I think it should
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 01:31:59PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Coupling this work with a comprehensive list of undocumented modules, perhaps
getting them documented along the way would really be a great idea. The
question really boils down to whether the upstream want this to happen or
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:09:43PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Do you think there would be opposition to using say docbook?
Lets find out.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=574465group_id=5470atid=355470
Greetings,
--
.~.
/V\ Bastian Kleineidam ยท Just
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
immutable, so repeatedly inserting/replacing small strings into the
whole document's string, having all the includes recursively
expanded would be quite bad) or something like (c)StringIO. But then
you have to do heavy regexp matching on
S'P == Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
S'P The problem is we now have a piece of a fairly common package
S'P using script(s) in a language few understand. So if you get
S'P hit by a bus someone WILL have to reverse engineer that script.
S'P This is the same reason
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is we now have a piece of a fairly common package using
script(s) in a language few understand. So if you get hit by a bus
someone WILL have to reverse engineer that script. This is the same
Well, I guess you mean py2texi.el's upstream
On 26-Jun-2002 Florent Rougon wrote:
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is we now have a piece of a fairly common package using
script(s) in a language few understand. So if you get hit by a bus
someone WILL have to reverse engineer that script. This is the same
Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
python2.1 (2.1.3-3) from sid
py2texi.el is a generated file
it is included in debian/patches/info-docs.dpatch
the fixinfo.el is replaced by it, fixinfo.el is not run.
OK, py2texi and fixinfo have nothing in common.
Dont know, seems that a lot of
Converting a hack to another hack with no strong reason nor fun is not
exactly what I dream of every night.
So, I am not sure that such a conversion would be worth the time spent.
If despite all of this you still want to tackle on this task and have
some ELisp questions (I think it should
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 12:07:43PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which python2.1 do you have? It is the same in woody and sid (2.1.3-3)
and doesn't seem to contain such a file:
python2.1 (2.1.3-3) from sid
py2texi.el is a generated file
it is
11 matches
Mail list logo
