Is the empty message meant to say that python2.6 has no future in
Debian? :-)
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 08:35 +0200, Jacques Brassé wrote:
>
>
--
$ python
>>> type(type(type))
My own blog is at http://www.zak.co.il/tddpirate/
My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine al
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1339914916.2170.0.ca...@nn.fritz.box
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 6 June 2012 11:51, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > Since some time, it's Plone
> > 4.[01] that requires Python 2.6. Only the still-in-beta Plone 4.2
> > even works with Python 2.7 (but 2.6 is still supported).
>
> For my own inter
On 6 June 2012 11:51, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Since some time, it's Plone
> 4.[01] that requires Python 2.6. Only the still-in-beta Plone 4.2
> even works with Python 2.7 (but 2.6 is still supported).
For my own interest, what does the current version do that prevents it
from working on 2.7? I
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:27:39AM +0900, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Toni Mueller writes:
> >> +1. Time to retire Python 2.6. From Bernd's reply it sounds like
> >> the Zope upgrade needn't block this.
> >
> > please DON'T!
> >
> > I am a heavy Zope user, and, as others stated already
Hello,
Toni Mueller writes:
>> +1. Time to retire Python 2.6. From Bernd's reply it sounds like
>> the Zope upgrade needn't block this.
>
> please DON'T!
>
> I am a heavy Zope user, and, as others stated already, the Debian
> packages for Zope are useless. Sorry to say it that way,
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:28:08PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> You can make and then support a private repo with python2.6 based on the
> last Debian release.
yes, I can. :/
I actually did something like this to get 2.6 in Lenny.
> If you expect official Debian support (including se
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:21:37AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > >After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we discussed
> > >whether to keep python2.6 for Wheezy or not. In theory, we should be able
> > >to
> > >get rid of python2.6 in time for the release (I'd likely be able t
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:43:23PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 04, 2012, at 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> >After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we discussed
> >whether to keep python2.6 for Wheezy or not. In theory, we should be able to
> >get rid of python2
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-01-08, 22:53:
The ${python:Depends} is fine, but ${shlibs:Depends} generates
dependencies on libpython that are superfluous, as well as the
necessary libslang, libnewt dependencies. I _could_ drop the
${shlibs:Depends} and replace it with just 'libnewt0.52', (the libc
[Alastair McKinstry, 2012-01-08]
> The ${python:Depends} is fine, but ${shlibs:Depends} generates
> dependencies on libpython that are superfluous,
> as well as the necessary libslang, libnewt dependencies. I _could_ drop
> the ${shlibs:Depends} and replace it with
> just 'libnewt0.52', (the libc a
per that I don't need libpython*.
Any ideas?
please CC: me in any response as I'm not currently subscribed to
debian-python
regards
Alastair McKinstry
Original Message
Subject: (forw) Re: Future of python2.6 in Debian (python-newt)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 20
Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> JFYI:
>
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > see
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python2.6-removal;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org,
> > the only blocker is packaging of zope2.13. feedback from the zope2
> > packagers is
> > outst
Hi,
JFYI:
Matthias Klose wrote:
> see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python2.6-removal;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org,
> the only blocker is packaging of zope2.13. feedback from the zope2 packagers
> is
> outstanding.
There's one issue which is not listed there but in
Hi,
I am sponsor of ordereddict package.
> On 01/04/2012 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which
>> is a
>> backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock
>> python2.7.
>
> please reject it for now.
>
> After switching py
On Jan 04, 2012, at 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we discussed
>whether to keep python2.6 for Wheezy or not. In theory, we should be able to
>get rid of python2.6 in time for the release (I'd likely be able to act as a
>driver for the
although that might indeed be a trend
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=zope-common
but there remain quite a few users (popcon of zope-common is 266) using zope
through Debian packages
so may be it is too early to "retire" Debian/Ubuntu Zope Team...
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 01/04/2012 02:26 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which is a
>> backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock python2.7.
>
> please reject it for now.
Why? It could still be r
On 01/04/2012 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which is a
> backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock python2.7.
please reject it for now.
> After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we
> discussed whe
Hi,
I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which is a
backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock python2.7.
After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we
discussed whether to keep python2.6 for Wheezy or not.
In theory, we should be able to get rid of
20 matches
Mail list logo
