Michael Schutte mi...@uiae.at writes:
This is how I understand the problem: python-central writes to
/usr/lib/python*/site-packages, while python-support uses
/var/lib/python-support/python*. Python finds docutils/__init__.py
in one directory and doesn’t look for modules starting with
Michael Schutte mi...@uiae.at writes:
It might make sense to wait a little longer for these uploads: Piotr
takes care of python-docutils’ conversion to python-support (from
-central)
I am waiting for ‘python-support’ 0.90 or later to reach ‘testing’
before doing a similar switch.
which
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 05:58:59PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Michael Schutte mi...@uiae.at writes:
It might make sense to wait a little longer for these uploads: Piotr
takes care of python-docutils’ conversion to python-support (from
-central)
I am waiting for ‘python-support’ 0.90 or
* Michael Schutte [Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:26:12 +0100]:
This is how I understand the problem: python-central writes to
/usr/lib/python*/site-packages, while python-support uses
/var/lib/python-support/python*. Python finds docutils/__init__.py in
one directory and doesn’t look for modules
Hi again,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:26:13PM +0100, Michael Schutte wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:36:38AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Let's give the discussion a week of elapsed time (Michael's original
message has the field ‘Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:55:03 +0100’) to
allow other
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:36:38AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Chris Lamb la...@debian.org writes:
Ah, I like this. We all agreed?
So far, yes.
Let's give the discussion a week of elapsed time (Michael's original
message has the field ‘Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:55:03 +0100’) to
allow other
Michael Schutte wrote:
I’ve considered this, of course, but I don’t know if this is really the
right thing to do given the frontend’s size (3 kiB in my case).
[..]
I’m not sure whether this is desirable.
Heh, no. Anyway, I'd be more than happy to rename to fit a
consensus/scheme.
Regards,
Michael Schutte wrote:
So I think the following naming style is appropriate:
docutils-reader-foo
[..]
These are components of the Docutils system; and such extensions can
be of several distinct purposes (hence “reader”, “transform”,
“writer”, etc.)
[..]
At the moment it’s really
Chris Lamb la...@debian.org writes:
Michael Schutte wrote:
At the moment it’s really just us three. So, Chris, what do you
think? :-)
Ah, I like this. We all agreed?
So far, yes.
Let's give the discussion a week of elapsed time (Michael's original
message has the field ‘Date: Wed, 11
Hi everyone,
I’m the maintainer of odtwriter, a Python library which enhances
docutils. It provides a docutils.writers.odtwriter module to make
docutils capable of writing OpenDocument Text files. For the user,
though, the /usr/bin/rst2odt script is the primary interface.
The binary package is
Michael Schutte wrote:
And then there is rst2pdf (Chris Lamb) which does the all-in-one thing
in a single eponymous .deb.
[..]
Since I care about consistency, I’d like to get this sorted out. My
personal preference would be “python-docutils-X”: it’s short,
reasonably precise and
Hey,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:41:18PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
And then there is rst2pdf (Chris Lamb) which does the all-in-one thing
in a single eponymous .deb.
[..]
Since I care about consistency, I’d like to get this sorted out. My
personal preference would be “python-docutils-X”:
Michael Schutte mi...@uiae.at writes:
The binary package is currently called python-odtwriter; after a
discussion in February 2008 [1], I decided to stick with this name.
I participated in that discussion, but I find that my position has
changed.
In the meantime, docutils-writer-manpage
13 matches
Mail list logo
