Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-17 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:22:09PM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > With the last upload of python-central, only a few issues with > python-central remain, before python 2.6 can be uploaded to unstable, > as has been outlined by Piotr here: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/11/msg00014.h

Re: Python 2.6 in unstable [symeig: resolved]

2009-11-16 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Jakub Wilk wrote: > 3) These packages failed likely because one of build-deps didn't > support python2.6: > ... symeig symeig functionality was absorbed into scipy. Thanks to the kind reminder/pointer made by upstream (Tiziano Zito) I've just uploaded -2 revision of symeig w

Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-15 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2009/11/14 Jakub Wilk : > * Piotr Ożarowski , 2009-11-14, 01:29: >> >> After rebuilding most packages that build depend on >> python-all{,-dev,-dbg}[0], I reported few more bugs. Packages that >> didn't FTBFS but ship files in /usr/local are now listed on that page as >> well (with "usr-local" user

Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-14 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2009/11/14 Jakub Wilk : > * Piotr Ożarowski , 2009-11-14, 01:29: >> >> After rebuilding most packages that build depend on >> python-all{,-dev,-dbg}[0], I reported few more bugs. Packages that >> didn't FTBFS but ship files in /usr/local are now listed on that page as >> well (with "usr-local" user

Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2009-11-14, 01:29: After rebuilding most packages that build depend on python-all{,-dev,-dbg}[0], I reported few more bugs. Packages that didn't FTBFS but ship files in /usr/local are now listed on that page as well (with "usr-local" usertag). If someone wants to help with ch

Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-13 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Piotr, On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:29:56AM +0100, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: > [Kumar Appaiah, 2009-11-08] > > http://tiny.pl/hqwjz > > After rebuilding most packages that build depend on > python-all{,-dev,-dbg}[0], I reported few more bugs. Packages that > didn't FTBFS but ship files in /usr/lo

Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-13 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Kumar Appaiah, 2009-11-08] > http://tiny.pl/hqwjz After rebuilding most packages that build depend on python-all{,-dev,-dbg}[0], I reported few more bugs. Packages that didn't FTBFS but ship files in /usr/local are now listed on that page as well (with "usr-local" usertag). If someone wants to h

Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-12 Thread Nicolas Chauvat
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:22:09PM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Debian Python, > > Most of the Python 2.6 transition bugs have been fixed, and the Nice work. -- Nicolas Chauvat logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de connaissances -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-08 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 22:22, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Debian Python, IIUIC s/Debian Python/Python Maintainer/ :) > Most of the Python 2.6 transition bugs have been fixed, and the > remaining ones are only some leaf packages, as can be seen here: > > http://tiny.pl/hqwjz > > With the last upl

Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-08 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Debian Python, Most of the Python 2.6 transition bugs have been fixed, and the remaining ones are only some leaf packages, as can be seen here: http://tiny.pl/hqwjz With the last upload of python-central, only a few issues with python-central remain, before python 2.6 can be uploaded to uns