Hi Daniel (2011.02.06_12:26:28_+0200)
I've converted didjvu to dh_python2 now, could anybody please check it
over again? Any hints welcome!
Looks fine. A couple of minor things:
Might as well use X-Python-Version instead of XS, as it's available in
python 2.6.6-3.
I like using Breaks:
All right, all fixed. Thanks for checking!
Daniel
On 06.02.2011 14:35, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Daniel (2011.02.06_12:26:28_+0200)
I've converted didjvu to dh_python2 now, could anybody please check it
over again? Any hints welcome!
Looks fine. A couple of minor things:
Might as well
Hi Daniel (2011.02.06_18:44:02_+0200)
All right, all fixed. Thanks for checking!
No problem. I am happy with the package and happy to sponsor it (it'd be
my first :P ).
Piotr is plotting to make Python 2.7 land in unstable in the next couple
of days (we hope), so I'd like to wait a bit and see
Hi debian-python (2011.02.06_19:25:31_+0200)
Piotr is plotting to make Python 2.7 land in unstable in the next couple
of days (we hope), so I'd like to wait a bit and see if this happens.
Of course, if this package stored its modules privately (which it
probably should, as I suggested before),
* Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com, 2011-01-11, 10:06:
djvusmooth 0.2.8-2
For the reference, it's been uploaded.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
* Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org, 2011-01-13, 16:11:
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
What about backportability? Do you plan to backport dh_python2 to lenny?
(I doesn't sound straight-forward, if doable at all.)
didjvu will never be backported to Lenny as it will not be released with
Squeeze
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
* Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org, 2011-01-11, 11:09:
I would like to refresh the RFS for the following packets:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
consider using dh_python2 instead of python-support
Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant
On Jan 13, 2011, at 03:33 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant python-support for
Python applications? (It's a 97% honest question!)
It's not better¹ and it's not worse. I asked to consider it for NEW
package because I want
* Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org, 2011-01-13, 15:33:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
consider using dh_python2 instead of python-support
Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant python-support for
Python applications? (It's a 97% honest question!)
It's not better¹ and it's not
[Barry Warsaw, 2011-01-13]
Actually, I think dh_python2 *is* better because the symlinks aren't created
at install time, but instead are included in the package.
we're talking about private modules here, python-support doesn't create
symlinks for private modules
--
Piotr Ożarowski
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
What about backportability? Do you plan to backport dh_python2 to lenny?
(I doesn't sound straight-forward, if doable at all.)
didjvu will never be backported to Lenny as it will not be released with
Squeeze
but yes, with one small change (to workaround missing
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 15:33, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
(I will ask the same for modules when 2.7 will be
the only supported Python 2.X version and thus the same will be true for
Python public modules).
is this some sort of subliminal message that wheezy is planned to
support
[Sandro Tosi, 2011-01-13]
is this some sort of subliminal message that wheezy is planned to
support only 2.7 ? :)
that's the plan (at least my plan), yes
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2010/10/msg00017.html
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Hi guys,
I would like to refresh the RFS for the following packets:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
djvusmooth 0.2.8-2 - maintainer switch, standards bumped to 3.9.1
pybtex 0.14.1-1 - new upstream release
Everything is at: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/python-apps/packages/
I would say
[Daniel Stender, 2011-01-11]
I would like to refresh the RFS for the following packets:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
consider using dh_python2 instead of python-support
djvusmooth 0.2.8-2 - maintainer switch, standards bumped to 3.9.1
pybtex 0.14.1-1 - new
* Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com, 2010-11-05, 18:45:
/python-apps/packages/ocrodjvu/tags/0.4.6-3
FTR, I uploaded ocrodjvu.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thanks Stefano for checking the packets and for the precious pointers (for most
of the issues it's
hard to find comprehensive documentation).
On 05.11.2010 20:46, Stefano Rivera wrote:
As a not-yet-DD I can't upload, but here's a review.
First, we don't tag releases until they are uploaded.
Hi Daniel (2010.11.06_11:47:14_+0200)
argparse is part of the standard library in Python 2.7. A dependency on
python (= 2.7) | python-argparse is probably preferable.
Allright.
I suppose that's not necessary, Jakub had a good point that python will
probably provide python-argparse when 2.7
All refreshed. How do I update tags? Svn copy (/trunk /tags/foo) says
permission denied.
Thanks for all pointers,
Daniel Stender
On 06.11.2010 11:15, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Daniel (2010.11.06_11:47:14_+0200)
argparse is part of the standard library in Python 2.7. A dependency on
python (=
Hi debian-python (2010.11.06_12:15:18_+0200)
Well, it installs, as Jakub also pointed out, you'll need a patch or
your own wrapper to get Python to find the private module.
Or the obvious solution, your previous one (and the one used by
the other packages in this set), to use a symlink to the
Another problem:
To give XS-Python-Version: = 2.6 together with ${misc:Depends},
${python:Depends}, python (=
2.7) | python-argparse in debian/control results in an INFO file in the
deb-packet which contains:
Depends: python (= 2.6), python (= 2.7) | python-argparse
On 06.11.2010 14:16,
Hi people,
I'm kindly asking for overchecking/uploading of the following packages:
/python-apps/packages/didjvu/tags/0.2.1-1/ initial release of 0.2.1
/python-apps/packages/djvusmooth/tags/0.2.8-2/
/python-apps/packages/ocrodjvu/tags/0.4.6-3 closes important bug
#600539
Hi Daniel (2010.11.05_19:45:42_+0200)
I'm kindly asking for overchecking/uploading of the following packages:
As a not-yet-DD I can't upload, but here's a review.
First, we don't tag releases until they are uploaded. You can leave the
changelog entry as UNRELEASED, and the sponsor will fix that
On Nov 05, 2010, at 09:46 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@
[...]
For new packages, you should probably consider using dh_python2 instead
of python-support. The eventual plan is to migrate all Python packages
to it.
Which should be as easy as adding --with python2 to
* Stefano Rivera stef...@rivera.za.net, 2010-11-05, 21:46:
debian/rules: Not a fan of dh $...@?
FWIW, I have nothing against dh $@, but I'm opposed to abuse of %-rules.
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@
override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install --
Moving this non-Python part of the discussion to ‘debian-mentors’.
Stefano Rivera stef...@rivera.za.net writes:
First, we don't tag releases until they are uploaded. You can leave the
changelog entry as UNRELEASED, and the sponsor will fix that and tag on
upload.
Is this common practise
Hi Ben (2010.11.05_23:18:41_+0200)
Is this common practise among sponsors?
It is for debian-python. I don't have any experience with other
SVN-using teams.
If the above convention (the sponsor will change ‘UNRELEASED’ to the
appropriate suite name before re-building) is common, is it
27 matches
Mail list logo
