* Daniel Stender dan...@danielstender.com, 2011-01-11, 10:06:
djvusmooth 0.2.8-2
For the reference, it's been uploaded.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
* Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org, 2011-01-13, 16:11:
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
What about backportability? Do you plan to backport dh_python2 to lenny?
(I doesn't sound straight-forward, if doable at all.)
didjvu will never be backported to Lenny as it will not be released with
Squeeze
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
* Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org, 2011-01-11, 11:09:
I would like to refresh the RFS for the following packets:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
consider using dh_python2 instead of python-support
Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant
On Jan 13, 2011, at 03:33 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant python-support for
Python applications? (It's a 97% honest question!)
It's not better¹ and it's not worse. I asked to consider it for NEW
package because I want
* Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org, 2011-01-13, 15:33:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
consider using dh_python2 instead of python-support
Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant python-support for
Python applications? (It's a 97% honest question!)
It's not better¹ and it's not
[Barry Warsaw, 2011-01-13]
Actually, I think dh_python2 *is* better because the symlinks aren't created
at install time, but instead are included in the package.
we're talking about private modules here, python-support doesn't create
symlinks for private modules
--
Piotr Ożarowski
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
What about backportability? Do you plan to backport dh_python2 to lenny?
(I doesn't sound straight-forward, if doable at all.)
didjvu will never be backported to Lenny as it will not be released with
Squeeze
but yes, with one small change (to workaround missing
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 15:33, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
(I will ask the same for modules when 2.7 will be
the only supported Python 2.X version and thus the same will be true for
Python public modules).
is this some sort of subliminal message that wheezy is planned to
support
[Sandro Tosi, 2011-01-13]
is this some sort of subliminal message that wheezy is planned to
support only 2.7 ? :)
that's the plan (at least my plan), yes
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2010/10/msg00017.html
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Hi guys,
I would like to refresh the RFS for the following packets:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
djvusmooth 0.2.8-2 - maintainer switch, standards bumped to 3.9.1
pybtex 0.14.1-1 - new upstream release
Everything is at: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/python-apps/packages/
I would say
[Daniel Stender, 2011-01-11]
I would like to refresh the RFS for the following packets:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
consider using dh_python2 instead of python-support
djvusmooth 0.2.8-2 - maintainer switch, standards bumped to 3.9.1
pybtex 0.14.1-1 - new
11 matches
Mail list logo
