[Nicolas CANIART, 2011-05-24]
Thanks for the faster than light answers. With respect to Sandro
answer, I don't see why I couldn't join the Python Module Team, but my
participation may remain marginal. I estimate I can almost guarantee a
two year commitment to that package, beyond I cannot
* Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org, 2011-05-25, 10:15:
source package name doesn't matter that much, but please use
python-pages rather than python-django-page-cms as binary package's
name (as Debian Python Policy suggests)
And pages is very bad name for a public Python module, especially if
Hi !
Thanks for the faster than light answers. With respect to Sandro
answer, I don't see why I couldn't join the Python Module Team, but my
participation may remain marginal. I estimate I can almost guarantee a
two year commitment to that package, beyond I cannot tell. There are
also a few
Hello Nicolas,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 15:43, Nicolas CANIART nico...@caniart.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to package the following python module I need:
python-django-gerbi-cms (http://packages.python.org/django-page-cms/)
Would you like to maintain it under DPMT[1] umbrella?
[1]
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:43:43PM +0200, Nicolas CANIART wrote:
I'm going to package the following python module I need:
python-django-gerbi-cms (http://packages.python.org/django-page-cms/)
I would like to now whether I should file an RFP or ITP bug report since I am
no debian maintainer
Anybody can file an ITP (and in fact, I'd guesstimate more than half of
the ITPs are filed by people without @debian.org addresses).
An RFP should only be filed if you're unable/unwilling to package it
yourself.
5 RFP This is a Request For Package. You have found an interesting
piece of
6 matches
Mail list logo
