Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)

2014-01-27 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2014-01-27 at 00:14:12 +0100, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: It has been a while since I have been meaning to post a message like this. I Thanks for writing this - Be more welcoming to newcomers. I think that the proof of previous work policy is a hurdle that we would be better off without.

Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again

2014-01-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 27.01.2014 00:14, schrieb Nicolas Dandrimont: - Adding Python 3 support when upstream has it I think this should make it into the python policy. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again

2014-01-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/27/2014 11:23 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: Am 27.01.2014 00:14, schrieb Nicolas Dandrimont: - Adding Python 3 support when upstream has it I think this should make it into the python policy. Matthias I agree. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)

2014-01-26 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:14:12AM +0100, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: [ awesome points here ] Cheers, Nicolas Dandrimont Hear, Hear! Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `.

Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)

2014-01-26 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 26 Jan 2014 16:33, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:14:12AM +0100, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: [ awesome points here ] Cheers, Nicolas Dandrimont Hear, Hear! Ditto - I agree with just about everything Nicolas said. I'd love to see this become a

Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again

2014-01-26 Thread Ben Finney
Nicolas Dandrimont ol...@debian.org writes: I am strongly of the opinion that the DPMT should be a team, not just a SVN repository with random packages and a mailing-list where people shout at each other when they dare touch those packages. Thanks for expressing these constructive ideas.