Re: Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or python3-jsonrpc-server?

2020-11-01 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! > When you say "follow that", do you mean for the Debian source package > name (.dsc, like dbus-python), or for the Debian binary package name > (.deb, like python3-dbus)? We'll go with 'python3-pyls-jsonrpc' for the binary package. > The binary package name should be mechanically derived

Re: Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or python3-jsonrpc-server?

2020-11-01 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 01 Nov 2020 at 19:36:52 +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I am currently reviewing the Debian packaging at > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-jsonrpc-server of > the upstream project https://github.com/palantir/python-jsonrpc-server > > Upstream uses

Re: Package naming advice: python3-pyls-jsonrpc or python3-jsonrpc-server?

2020-11-01 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi Otto, * Otto Kekäläinen [2020-11-01 19:36]: Upstream uses 'python-jsonrpc-server' as the repository and also the pip package name. Should we follow that in Debian or perhaps use the alternative name 'python3-pyls-jsonrpc'? Is there some existing naming convention/policy about Python