Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-21 Thread Paul Boddie
On Monday, 21 August 2023 15:01:26 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > If you want, you can simplify more (it's not exactly the same, so it > might or might not help). There is a way on GitLab to point to the > latest build of a job. For example, you have the following URL for one > of the git

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-21 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi, On 20 Aug 2023 at 23:16:57, Paul Boddie wrote: > On Sunday, 20 August 2023 14:06:37 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: [...] Thanks for sharing your path here, and I'm happy that you are reaching your destination :-) > autopkgtest: > extends: .test-autopkgtest > variables: >

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-20 Thread Paul Boddie
On Sunday, 20 August 2023 14:06:37 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > Interesting approach, but if you could use the variables and ship the > shell script it might reduce some duplication between jobs (if possible, > I haven't look into too much detail in your case) and more importantly > you

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-20 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi, On 20 Aug 2023 at 00:49:20, Paul Boddie wrote: > On Saturday, 19 August 2023 20:32:59 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > > > Quick answer for now... > > And a very quick reply from me... :-) > > [...] > > > I don't know if a .asc files are allowed. Actually, from my > > .bash_history:

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-19 Thread Paul Boddie
On Saturday, 19 August 2023 20:32:59 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > Quick answer for now... And a very quick reply from me... :-) [...] > I don't know if a .asc files are allowed. Actually, from my > .bash_history: > --- > wget -O- https://www.virtualbox.org/download/oracle_vbox_2016.asc

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-19 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi, Quick answer for now... On 19 Aug 2023 at 19:04:09, Paul Boddie wrote: > On Friday, 18 August 2023 19:54:55 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > > > Ha! I wasn't aware of the aptly option > > (https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/#using-automatically-built-> > > apt-repository

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-19 Thread Paul Boddie
On Friday, 18 August 2023 19:54:55 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > Ha! I wasn't aware of the aptly option > (https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/#using-automatically-built-> > apt-repository and SALSA_CI_DISABLE_APTLY=0). > I think that I might have re-invented the wheel in a

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-18 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi, On 18 Aug 2023 at 19:03:48, Paul Boddie wrote: > On Friday, 18 August 2023 16:12:19 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > > > For the jobs it is happening via > > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/#using-automatically-built- > apt-repository > > Reviewing this documentation

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-18 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 07:19:18PM +0200, Paul Boddie wrote: > > > Here, it would seem that the most prudent approach is to use the Salsa CI > > > service instead of trying to get the test suite to run during the package > > > build process. > > > > You should do both if possible, assuming that

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-18 Thread Paul Boddie
On Friday, 18 August 2023 18:21:00 CEST Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:10:08PM +0200, Paul Boddie wrote: > > Here, it would seem that the most prudent approach is to use the Salsa CI > > service instead of trying to get the test suite to run during the package > > build

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-18 Thread Paul Boddie
On Friday, 18 August 2023 16:12:19 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > For the jobs it is happening via > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/#using-automatically-built- apt-repository Reviewing this documentation is actually more helpful than I thought it would be. I had noticed

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-18 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 05:10:08PM +0200, Paul Boddie wrote: > Here, it would seem that the most prudent approach is to use the Salsa CI > service instead of trying to get the test suite to run during the package > build process. You should do both if possible, assuming that by "Salsa CI

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-18 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi, On 18 Aug 2023 at 13:16:15, Paul Boddie wrote: > On Friday, 18 August 2023 09:51:29 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > > > I'm not a Debian developer but I have some experience on Salsa CI, so I > > thought that I might be able to help... but then I was confused by a > > specific part of

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-18 Thread Paul Boddie
On Friday, 18 August 2023 09:51:29 CEST Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > I'm not a Debian developer but I have some experience on Salsa CI, so I > thought that I might be able to help... but then I was confused by a > specific part of the message: > > On 17 Aug 2023 at 17:10:08, Paul Boddie

Re: Package testing with Salsa CI for new packages

2023-08-18 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi, I'm not a Debian developer but I have some experience on Salsa CI, so I thought that I might be able to help... but then I was confused by a specific part of the message: On 17 Aug 2023 at 17:10:08, Paul Boddie wrote: [...] > For another package I have been working on, the Salsa CI