On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
Even if most users don't need them, tests greatly increase the value
of bugreports and doesn't bloat python packages too much.
True. What do other people think of
Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
Even if most users don't need them, tests greatly increase the value
of bugreports and doesn't bloat python packages too much.
True. What do other people think of the issue?
If unit tests were in the package, reportbug could automatically
run
On Sat, 2009-26-12 at 17:13 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
Even if most users don't need them, tests greatly increase the value
of bugreports and doesn't bloat python packages too much.
True. What do other people think of the issue?
They
W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org writes:
Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
Even if most users don't need them, tests greatly increase the value
of bugreports and doesn't bloat python packages too much.
True. What do other people think of the issue?
I think the judgement
Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
Python policy is silent about unit tests. Should they be stripped? Or
should they be Debianized or left as-is?
Just my opinion: Unit tests should be in the source package, but not
in the binary package. Most users don't need them, and if somebody
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
Python policy is silent about unit tests. Should they be stripped? Or
should they be Debianized or left as-is?
Just my opinion: Unit tests should be in the source
6 matches
Mail list logo
