On Sun, 2025-11-23 at 11:55 -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
> Secondly, I'd like to request someone to sponsor this upload, if the
> current changes are up to the standards.
Thanks for all the help and for incorporating my patches Jochen :)
Regards,
Aeliton
On Sun, 2025-11-23 at 06:47 -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-11-22 at 16:48 -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
> > >
> > I'll test this with pbuilder too. I'll post results soon.
>
> I can confirm that the pbuilder runs also produced identical results
> with --profiles nocheck and --pro
On Sun, 2025-11-23 at 13:50 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 22.11.25 um 21:48 schrieb Aeliton G. Silva:
>
> > I'll test this with pbuilder too. I'll post results soon.
>
> or you work mainly on the forked repository within your namespace and
> use the Salsa CI doing this stupid w
Hello,
Am 22.11.25 um 21:48 schrieb Aeliton G. Silva:
I'll test this with pbuilder too. I'll post results soon.
or you work mainly on the forked repository within your namespace and
use the Salsa CI doing this stupid work do for your while your package
update workflow.
https://salsa.debia
Dear all,
I'm completely overwhelmed with work at present. I should be able to
get some time to work on Spyder over the winter holidays, though. So
feel free to upload python-lsp-server (and you could always upload
spyder with a loosened dependency in the meantime).
Best wishes,
Julian
On
On Sat, 2025-11-22 at 16:40 -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-11-22 at 21:46 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 01:39:05PM -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
> > > $ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck
> > > $ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nocheck"
> > > $ gbp buildpacka
On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 01:39:05PM -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
$ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck
$ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nocheck"
$ gbp buildpackage
Unless the build runs in a minimal chroot, this test doesn't make sure that
the optional deps aren't installed.
I also can't say if this
On Sat, 2025-11-22 at 13:39 -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-11-22 at 20:35 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > > > > > Can you test if this is a test only dependency and can be
> > > > > > annotated
> > > > > > with ?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Good shout, thanks. websockets
On Sat, 2025-11-22 at 20:35 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > > > > Can you test if this is a test only dependency and can be
> > > > > annotated
> > > > > with ?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Good shout, thanks. websockets are in the [project.optional-
> > > > dependencies] in the pyproject.toml
On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 12:30:29PM -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
No, the upload to Debian archive is only done by your sponsor.
>
> Push your repo to salsa.debian.org:
This is not about uploading to the archive.
Thanks for the clarifications Andrey.
About pushing it to salsa, can I do it o
On Sat, 2025-11-22 at 14:03 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
>
> No, the upload to Debian archive is only done by your sponsor.
>
> >
> > Push your repo to salsa.debian.org:
>
> This is not about uploading to the archive.
>
Thanks for the clarifications Andrey.
About pushing it to salsa, ca
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 07:01:51PM -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
quoting form the wiki:
> Once you've built and uploaded your package,
Note the "uploaded" (to the Debian archive). So you should not tag.
I want to be extra careful to not disturb anyone, so I'd like to
clarify: is the upload t
On Fri, 2025-11-21 at 14:20 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 06:06:31AM -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
> > There's one last thing I want to do: to build this package on a
> > newly
> > install of sid (to make sure all the build deps are on
> > debian/control).
>
> You sh
On Fri, 2025-11-21 at 11:20 +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>
> quoting form the wiki:
>
> > Once you've built and uploaded your package,
>
> Note the "uploaded" (to the Debian archive). So you should not tag.
I want to be extra careful to not disturb anyone, so I'd like to
clarify: is the upl
Hi Aeliton,
thanks for working on this. python-lsp-server is version locked by
python3-spyder and needs coordination with Julian (Cc).
@Julian: can we get a new version in?
* Aeliton G. Silva [2025-11-21 06:06]:
I managed to create a working package for python-lsp-server using the
upstream
On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 06:06:31AM -0300, Aeliton G. Silva wrote:
There's one last thing I want to do: to build this package on a newly
install of sid (to make sure all the build deps are on debian/control).
You should use a chroot build tool like sbuild instead of installing a sid
system manu
16 matches
Mail list logo
