Re: python2.7 as default: where are we? (Was: Bug#641207: ITP: ordereddict)

2011-09-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 23:58:26 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: Il 12/09/2011 09:53, Julien Cristau ha scritto: So out of these, I'd expect that libimobiledevice, gobject-introspection and pygobject (and maybe hplip?) need to be fixed, and the rest can hopefully be removed if they stay

Re: python2.7 as default: where are we? (Was: Bug#641207: ITP: ordereddict)

2011-09-18 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 12/09/2011 09:53, Julien Cristau ha scritto: So out of these, I'd expect that libimobiledevice, gobject-introspection and pygobject (and maybe hplip?) need to be fixed, and the rest can hopefully be removed if they stay broken. libimobiledevice, pygobject and hplip are fixed,

Re: python2.7 as default: where are we? (Was: Bug#641207: ITP: ordereddict)

2011-09-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: Would it be possible to draw a map of things still to finish before attempting to switch default to 2.7? There are a couple of resources already ([0] and [1]), are there other useful bits around? The same as the release.d.o bug, but:

Re: python2.7 as default: where are we? (Was: Bug#641207: ITP: ordereddict)

2011-09-11 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Luca (2011.09.11_23:38:35_+0200) Would it be possible to draw a map of things still to finish before attempting to switch default to 2.7? There are a couple of resources already ([0] and [1]), are there other useful bits around? [0] http://bugs.debian.org/622279 [1]