On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:03:20PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> If you depend on python3-sphinx (>= 1.7.5-4~) then most likely the scripts
> will be using Python 3. The opposite will happen only if the user manually
> updated the alternative, and this won’t be the case on a sane build
>
Hi Ondřej!
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 09:50:25AM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have question about sphinx-build and our effort to move to Python 3.
>
> sphinx-build is currently Python 2 or Python 3 according to python-sphinx /
> python3-sphinx package installed (with python3 as default if
Hi,
út 21. 8. 2018 v 12:37 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal:
> On top of this, I generally also do PYTHON=python3, just in case the
> Sphinx doc needs to invoke the interpreter...
>
i don't think this is good idea. If Sphinx doc needs to invoke interpreter,
it should do it in more smart way.
Hi,
po 20. 8. 2018 v 12:37 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal:
> If you do the later, then anyway, you'll have to do the former if you
> need backports. This bite me a few times with OpenStack already. So, no
> mater what the faith of the sphinx-build command, it's always best to
> use python3 -m
On 08/20/2018 09:50 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have question about sphinx-build and our effort to move to Python 3.
>
> sphinx-build is currently Python 2 or Python 3 according to
> python-sphinx / python3-sphinx package installed (with python3 as
> default if both are installed by
5 matches
Mail list logo
