Matthias Klose wrote:
>>If we change Python policy according to this I would fully agree here.
> Anybody to write the PEP and define the import rules?
I'm not sure whether I'm qualified, but I'd sure like to help.
> - which order do have arch dependent and arch-independent directories?
> concaten
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> > I do not agree on one thing though: the majority of Products for zope are
> > python source code and so they are architecture independent. That's quite
> > the
> > same for other python modules. We should not sto
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> This is a good idea to me, and it's worth of trying: there are olso other
> packages which are included in Zope source for convenience (like ZPT, or ZEO)
> for which we can try as well.
In fact your plan to package ZEO separately was one
Hi all,
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 05:49:30PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ZODB has its own source tree
[...]
> So I wonder if we should not provide an extra ZODB package which
> can be used separately from Zope - and will be used by Zope for sure.
> Moreover it comes to my mind whether
Hello,
ZODB has its own source tree
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/FrontPage
and even sourceforge project
http://sourceforge.net/projects/zodb/
It also has its usage without Zope
http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Articles/ZODB1
I tried these examples but had some trouble get them
5 matches
Mail list logo
