Hi Donovan,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:38:17AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
Did you see my analysis and modified register-python-package script? I
posted it under a misleading subject by mistake (responded to another thread
that migrated onto it).
Sorry, sometimes I have lag in responding :)
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:07:53PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
Hi Donovan,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:38:17AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
Did you see my analysis and modified register-python-package script? I
posted it under a misleading subject by mistake (responded to another
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:34:46PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
...
OK, I got creative and figured out a way the python-central could work
without using an emac's style registry, instead just using the existing dpkg
Depends: information.
Comments welcome. This one is a bit more tested than
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:35:47AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 03:31:26PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
The python-central approach attempts to provide a single package that
supports multiple versions of python.
Education of end-users and even packagers is
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 05:38:25PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:34:46PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
...
OK, I got creative and figured out a way the python-central could work
without using an emac's style registry, instead just using the existing dpkg
Depends:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 05:54:24PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:35:47AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 03:31:26PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
[...]
The packages, provided they are built right, will be pretty self
explanitory. Installing python-foo
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 05:38:25PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
Are you sure all package names are sane? Or could some joker distribute a
(non official ofcourse) python package with a name just waiting to exploit
this unsanitized use of its name in a script running as root?
Huh? Aren't these
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:55:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 05:38:25PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
Are you sure all package names are sane? Or could some joker distribute a
(non official ofcourse) python package with a name just waiting to exploit
this
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 07:03:59PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:38:17AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 12:05:22AM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
[...]
Did you see my analysis and modified register-python-package script? I
posted it under
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 03:31:26PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 07:03:59PM -0500, Jim Penny wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:38:17AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 12:05:22AM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
[...]
Did you see my analysis
the last.
--
--
ABO: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info, including pgp key
--
#!/bin/sh
# the python registrar
# directory with registered packages
CENTRAL=/var
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 12:05:22AM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
Hello.
The first version of the python-central package is online at
http://people.debian.org/~calvin/python-central/
It provides support for installing pure Python modules independent
of the Python version (see Python
Hello.
The first version of the python-central package is online at
http://people.debian.org/~calvin/python-central/
It provides support for installing pure Python modules independent
of the Python version (see Python Policy 2.2.3).
I made a patch for the python1.5 package which uses this
13 matches
Mail list logo