Re: bringing python-django-registration back into testing, dfsg issues

2022-09-30 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi
On 2022-09-27 at 08:17:39 +1000, Craig Small wrote: > Given they sit under Public aren't they DATA FILES and subject to > https://www.unicode.org/license.txt > That license seems very BSD 3-Clause-ish. > [...] thanks, I was using my pessimist parser :) and didn't notice the good news.

Re: bringing python-django-registration back into testing, dfsg issues

2022-09-26 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 19:18, Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi < valha...@debian.org> wrote: > http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/Scripts.txt > http://www.unicode.org/Public/security/latest/confusables.txt > which, if my understanding of https://www.unicode.org/copyright.html is > correct aren't

bringing python-django-registration back into testing, dfsg issues

2022-09-26 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi
Hello python-django-registration has been removed from testing, and since it's an useful package I'd like to bring it back into it. There is a new upstream release, and there was already some work done in git to package it, but it was failing because upstream has added a new dependency on