(Matthias drew my attention to this thread. Sorry I'm a bit late ...)
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
I haven't yet seen any reasoning why people are seeing that
information as cluttering the database or just as ugly.
Causing unrelated programs like dpkg-repack
Le lundi 24 juillet 2006 à 23:18 -0500, Joe Wreschnig a écrit :
(Or, finally announce that Python 2.4 is plain too late for etch. Then
people can have as long as they want to debate over this crap, and
Python developers can just give up hope.)
Well, isn't the whole purpose of that new policy
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:27 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 24 juillet 2006 à 23:18 -0500, Joe Wreschnig a écrit :
(Or, finally announce that Python 2.4 is plain too late for etch. Then
people can have as long as they want to debate over this crap, and
Python developers can just
Le lun 24 juillet 2006 16:26, Joey Hess a écrit :
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
dpkg-repack (from sid dpkg 1.13.22) gives warnings when repacking
python packages:
...
warning, `./dpkg-repack-5343/DEBIAN/control' contains user-defined
field `Python-Version'
...
What effect does this
* Pierre Habouzit [Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:11:14 +0200]:
just FYI, it's not mandatory [XB-Python-Version], one can use
debian/pyversions instead (with python-support).
Hm. I can see how debian/pyversions can substitute XS-Python-Version
(both are available only at build time), but I fail to see
Le lun 24 juillet 2006 19:52, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
* Pierre Habouzit [Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:11:14 +0200]:
just FYI, it's not mandatory [XB-Python-Version], one can use
debian/pyversions instead (with python-support).
Hm. I can see how debian/pyversions can substitute XS-Python-Version
(Thanks for the CC.)
Matthias Klose wrote:
I haven't yet seen any reasoning why people are seeing that
information as cluttering the database or just as ugly.
Causing unrelated programs like dpkg-repack to spew warning messages is,
by definition, ugly.
Using X- fields, which are intended for
* Matthias Klose [Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:56:29 +0200]:
I agree that having Python-Version in binary packages is dislikeable.
Out of curiosity, Matthias, would be a DEBIAN/pyversions file able to
provide the same information to pycentral?
^^^
just looking at
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 02:07 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Matthias Klose [Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:56:29 +0200]:
I agree that having Python-Version in binary packages is dislikeable.
Out of curiosity, Matthias, would be a DEBIAN/pyversions file able to
provide the same information to
9 matches
Mail list logo
