Am 07.05.2014 16:45, schrieb Matthias Klose:
Attached is a proposed change to the Debian Python policy to focus on Python3
within the distribution. The intent is to document and start a large journey
towards one Python stack in Debian. This is unlikely to happen for jessie+1,
but
we should
* Jordan Metzmeier: Re: favouring Python3 in the Debian policy (Wed, 7 May
2014 21:55:20 -0500):
Hello Jordan,
The jurko fork was the one I was working with when attempting the port
to suds. I never made it to testing under python3.
[...]
I consider debbugs to be broken, not suds
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Mathias Behrle mathi...@m9s.biz wrote:
* Jordan Metzmeier: Re: favouring Python3 in the Debian policy (Wed, 7 May
2014 21:55:20 -0500):
Hello Jordan,
The jurko fork was the one I was working with when attempting the port
to suds. I never made it to testing
Attached is a proposed change to the Debian Python policy to focus on Python3
within the distribution. The intent is to document and start a large journey
towards one Python stack in Debian. This is unlikely to happen for jessie+1, but
we should state the plan now so that it doesn't come later as
On May 07, 2014, at 04:45 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Attached is a proposed change to the Debian Python policy to focus on Python3
within the distribution. The intent is to document and start a large journey
towards one Python stack in Debian. This is unlikely to happen for jessie+1,
but we
On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 11:27:20 Barry Warsaw wrote:
Should we also update Appendix B to promote --buildsystem=pybuild or at
least reference it?
It's a reasonably safe bet that almost anything needs update.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org writes:
=== modified file 'debian/python-policy.sgml'
--- debian/python-policy.sgml 2013-05-22 02:12:02 +
+++ debian/python-policy.sgml 2014-05-07 14:34:24 +
[…]
@@ -42,8 +42,7 @@
copyright
copyrightsummary
- Copyright copy;
On May 08, 2014, at 06:41 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Can we converge on a single way to represent the names of these systems
in the document? Currently there seems to be “python3”, “Python3”,
“Python 3” used indiscriminately, without being clear why they would be
spelled differently like that.
I'd
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:15:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 17:27, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
+ penumlist
+item
+ p
+Applications should use Python3, and should not be
+
On 7 May 2014 14:11, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com wrote:
If I had more time to blow, I'd likely try a run at something SUDS API
compatible in Python 3. Won't happen any time soon for me, but it's
something I will eternally praise someone over.
So many people have tried to forward-port
Am 07.05.2014 23:01, schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:15:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 17:27, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
+ penumlist + item + p + Applications
should use
Python3, and should not be + packaged for Python2 as
On May 07, 2014, at 02:01 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
I don't think scripts outside the archive are in scope for the python
policy; and I don't think this is what Barry was referring to. I think he
meant python commandline programs, which some people may not think of as
being applications?
Right.
On May 07, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
thas was tools outside the archive. Debian has some infrastructure written
in Python. I don't know if all of this is packaged and available in the
archive.
I'm personally less concerned about those than packages inside the archive.
-Barry
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:43:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 23:01, schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:15:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 17:27, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
+penumlist + item + p +
Applications
On May 07, 2014, at 02:29 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
This fork looks like it's actively maintained, and has a recent release on
PyPI (as suds-jurko):
https://bitbucket.org/jurko/suds
There seems to be quite a few forks on PyPI:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=searchterm=sudssubmit=search
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
FWIW, while I think getting the python policy to recommend Python3 is a good
step forward, I think it's more important that we make sure the base
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote:
On May 07, 2014, at 02:29 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
This fork looks like it's actively maintained, and has a recent release on
PyPI (as suds-jurko):
https://bitbucket.org/jurko/suds
There seems to be quite a few forks on
17 matches
Mail list logo
