Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-04-19 Thread Alexandre Detiste
> /etc/matplotlibrc. We have another example: pip reads /etc/pip.conf and it's really useful to document there what the company proxy is named. So reverting the old patched /etc/matplotlibrc to upstream pristine config was a first step in right direction; I agree it should be removed later. I

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-04-12 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 12 April 2025 6:18:20 pm IST, James Addison wrote: >Hi Nilesh, Alex, > >Responding to the first point only, at the moment: > >On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 07:39, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> [ ... snip ... ] >> 1. matplotlib has historically shipped /etc/matploblibrc to forc

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-04-12 Thread James Addison
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 20:37, James Addison wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 18:18, Alexandre Detiste > wrote: > > > > In a later step we could discard unmodified config files based on a list of > > md5sum of what shipped in stable release. > > > > So only users of default settings would get th

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-04-12 Thread James Addison
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 18:18, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > > In a later step we could discard unmodified config files based on a list of > md5sum of what shipped in stable release. > > So only users of default settings would get the new default settings. Ok; and it seems the relevant query term /

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-04-12 Thread Alexandre Detiste
: > Hi Nilesh, Alex, > > Responding to the first point only, at the moment: > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 07:39, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > [ ... snip ... ] > > 1. matplotlib has historically shipped /etc/matploblibrc to force tkagg > and patched the code > > to use

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-04-12 Thread James Addison
Hi Nilesh, Alex, Responding to the first point only, at the moment: On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 07:39, Nilesh Patra wrote: > [ ... snip ... ] > 1. matplotlib has historically shipped /etc/matploblibrc to force tkagg and > patched the code > to use this if there are no user defined rc

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-04-12 Thread Alexandre Detiste
ional /etc/matplotlibrc , /etc/git... to provision system defaults, maybe other do so) 2. Yes, MPL should be fixed here. The idea to ask people to remove gedit to work around problem looks weird ;-) Greetings Le sam. 12 avr. 2025 à 09:39, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > > Hi Alex, James, all, >

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-04-12 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Alex, James, all, Seems matplotlib migrated to testing now. I was thinking if it makes sense to do an incremental 3.10.1+dfsg1-3 release. There are 2 things that bother me that could be fixed in this release: 1. matplotlib has historically shipped /etc/matploblibrc to force tkagg and

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-30 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Thank you ! Le dim. 30 mars 2025 à 13:32, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > > python-maggma_0.70.0-3_unstable.log > > Failure due to missing dependencies > (pyproject_hooks._impl.BackendUnavailable: Cannot import > 'setuptools.build_meta') + python3-setuptools easy to fix, only wondering why it didn't

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-30 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Lucas, On 30/03/25 1:35 pm, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Sorry for not replying earlier. I see that you uploaded matplotlib 3.10 > to unstable in the meantime. I did a rebuild of unstable two days ago, > and did not notice anything specific related to matplotlib. > > The build fai

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
hould solve majority of issues. > > > >Only five autopkgtest failing and already two packages fixed ! > > > >Can we ask $someone to rebuild everything from unstable that > >depends on matplotlib against this new version ? > >(to see what fails) > > Sinc

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-23 Thread James Addison
remaining which hangs > > on arm64 but works fine on amd64. > > > > On a brief look, it does not really look related to matplotlib. > > > > It could be great to try it out with current matplotlib on arm64 in debci > > like environment. If it hangs, we can just

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-22 Thread Nilesh Patra
majority of issues. >> >> Only five autopkgtest failing and already two packages fixed ! > > I cleaned up 2 more. Now there is only one mdanalysis remaining which hangs > on arm64 but works fine on amd64. > > On a brief look, it does not really look related to matp

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
already two packages fixed ! I cleaned up 2 more. Now there is only one mdanalysis remaining which hangs on arm64 but works fine on amd64. On a brief look, it does not really look related to matplotlib. It could be great to try it out with current matplotlib on arm64 in debci like environment. If

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
already two packages fixed ! > >Can we ask $someone to rebuild everything from unstable that >depends on matplotlib against this new version ? >(to see what fails) Since there is no as such ABI for this, which other modules use, so it won't be a transition per se as far as I understa

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
ed do not show up. On that entire page, you will mostly find packages that are _failing_. It is also not correct (or even believable) that only 5 packages in the whole archive ever depend on matplotlib for tests given this is a very popular plotting library. So that statement is incorrect. hm

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
failing and already two packages fixed ! pseudo-excuses shows only 5 packages running tests and of them, all 5 packages are failing - I'd rephrase this as 100% of the packages that manually declared python3-matplotlib in Testsuite-Triggers had failing tests. When I saw the list yesterda

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-17 Thread Stuart Prescott
ntire page, you will mostly find packages that are _failing_. It is also not correct (or even believable) that only 5 packages in the whole archive ever depend on matplotlib for tests given this is a very popular plotting library. So that statement is incorrect. hmm, ok, I'm very happy to be

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-17 Thread Stuart Prescott
-excuses shows only 5 packages running tests and of them, all 5 packages are failing - I'd rephrase this as 100% of the packages that manually declared python3-matplotlib in Testsuite-Triggers had failing tests. Of course autopkgtest only tests packages that explicitly depend on python3-matpl

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-17 Thread Alexandre Detiste
e that depends on matplotlib against this new version ? (to see what fails) I might remember there was a free-service instance available somewhere but wouldn't mind some hand-holding. Greetings Alexandre

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-16 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 17 March 2025 3:01:31 am IST, Alexandre Detiste wrote: >Hey, > >It uses Wayland now ! (or I mean automagically) In all previous versions, the Tkagg backend was being forced in /etc/matplotlibrc. I removed that enforcing in this upload and let matplotlib do the work of

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-16 Thread Alexandre Detiste
the CI results too. The list is already much smaller than for the previous version bump. Thank you Le dim. 16 mars 2025 à 15:52, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > Quick update: Uploaded matplotlib 3.10.1 with Jay's patch and a fix > to not set backend to Tkagg system-wide (in /etc/matplotlib

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-16 Thread Nilesh Patra
Quick update: Uploaded matplotlib 3.10.1 with Jay's patch and a fix to not set backend to Tkagg system-wide (in /etc/matplotlibrc). I will check the pseudo-excuses on britney in around week. Hopefully, this upload should solve majority of issues. Thanks, Nilesh

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-12 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi James, On 13 March 2025 4:05:04 am IST, James Addison wrote: >On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 13:15, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> [ ... snip ... ] >> @Alexandre or someone else, could you please help w validating the fix or >> upload a -3 >> to experimental? >> >>

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-12 Thread James Addison
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 13:15, Nilesh Patra wrote: > [ ... snip ... ] > @Alexandre or someone else, could you please help w validating the fix or > upload a -3 > to experimental? > > [1] > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/f45707d9e6111a83d2c741530cbff2b

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-11 Thread Nilesh Patra
is does > not look > like a packaging error to me but please review! Jay was very kind to investigate here and supplied w a patch[1] and a PR [2]. Unfortunately, I do not have the environment to repro this reliably, nor have my yubikey to actually upload this to experimental. @Alexandre or someon

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-03-06 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 23/02/25 6:03 pm, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > On 23/02/25 05:19, Alexandre Detiste wrote: >> There was a cyclic bootstrap relationship between this and ... Pandas (?) >> in the Numpy transition that was handled swiftly in the Pandas side >> but I thing we are a now far enough in Numpy transit

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-02-23 Thread James Addison
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 at 18:24, James Addison wrote: > [ ... snip ... ] > I've built matplotlib 3.10 from experimental (including the no-PFB > patch from the exp2 upload) successfully and have been able to use > that to rebuild the astropy-doc package; as a result I think I'

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-02-23 Thread James Addison
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 at 23:49, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > [ ... snip ... ] > James : do you want to help ;-) You can merge your own MR if you feel > confident. >https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/matplotlib/-/merge_requests/6 Thank you, Alexandre and Nilesh! I think

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-02-23 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 23/02/25 05:19, Alexandre Detiste wrote: There was a cyclic bootstrap relationship between this and ... Pandas (?) in the Numpy transition that was handled swiftly in the Pandas side but I thing we are a now far enough in Numpy transition the reopload 3.8 to unstable with the accumulated fi

Re: Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-02-22 Thread Stuart Prescott
Hi Alexandre But 3.8 does not even build most of the days Trying rerun the Salsa CI does not help because log is too long and truncated. The full log from salsaci is available in the artifacts section of the project on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/matplotlib

Matplotlib 3.10.0 for trixie?

2025-02-15 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi all, Hi Alexandre, There's approximately 2 months of time still for soft freeze. I believe we have enough time for a matplotlib update (and transition to testing). Should we go for it? I will try to spend some hours tonight to see how much work this may be. Thanks, Nilesh

Re: Matplotlib testing migration

2024-07-22 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:40:23AM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > I joined Astro team and took care of matplotlib rdeps there. > > I'm struggling with basemap... I don't understand how > this multi-package with it's 3 setup.py works. > It&#x

Re: matplotlib

2024-03-20 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:32:04AM +0900, ciel wrote: > Alexandre-san, > > Sorry, it seems like I cannot contribute this because (at least) I'm > pretty not sure if I can transplant this line properly: > > ``` > ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > echo "backend : TkAgg" > ma

Re: matplotlib

2024-03-19 Thread ciel
ty-ng/debian/rules > 25 lmfit-py/debian/rules > 21 logbook/debian/rules > 28 logilab-constraint/debian/rules > 35 love/debian/rules > 21 ltris/debian/rules > 15 lua-lpeg/debian/rules > 13 magic-wormhole/debian/rules >206 matplotlib/debian/rules >

matplotlib

2024-03-19 Thread Alexandre Detiste
ook/debian/rules 28 logilab-constraint/debian/rules 35 love/debian/rules 21 ltris/debian/rules 15 lua-lpeg/debian/rules 13 magic-wormhole/debian/rules 206 matplotlib/debian/rules 14 mdp/debian/rules 18 microsoft-authentication-library-for-python/debian/rules 56 minet

Bug#1004960: ITP: cmyt -- Matplotlib colormaps from the yt project

2022-02-04 Thread Ole Streicher
: https://github.com/yt-project/cmyt * License : BSD-3-Clause Programming Lang: Python Description : Matplotlib colormaps from the yt project cmyt integrates with matplotlib in a similar fashion to cmocean or cmasher It is a new build dependency of the "yt" packa

Bug#998234: ITP: mpl-animators: An interative animation framework for matplotlib

2021-11-01 Thread Ole Streicher
://github.com/sunpy/mpl-animators * License : BSD-3-Clause Programming Lang: Python Description : An interative animation framework for matplotlib The mpl_animators package provides a set of classes which allow the easy construction of interactive matplotlib widget based animations. “Out of

Bug#959968: RFS: mplcursors/0.3-1 [ITP] -- Interactive data selection cursors for Matplotlib

2020-05-07 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
github.com/anntzer/mplcursors * License : MIT * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/sudip/mplcursors Section : python It builds those binary packages: python3-mplcursors - Interactive data selection cursors for Matplotlib To access further information about this packa

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
o a discussion about numpy) - make src:python-numpy provide only python2 package - fork src:numpy from src:python-numpy to provide only python3 modules. since i'm the maintainer of both matplotlib and numpy, i'll take care of these "transitions" -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread W. Martin Borgert
kport? I'm sure, immediately after release, we (= Python teams) will start to drop Python 2 support anyway. In the mean time new versions of matplotlib and friends, as well as orange, might be suitable for experimental, so that your packaging work doesn't need to wait. Orange looks very inter

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 22:11, wrote: > On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 11:45 +0300, Arto Jantunen wrote: > > ghisv...@gmail.com writes: > > > Don't get me wrong, I am all in favour for a modern stack, > > > including > > > Python 3. > > > > > > However, upgrading NumPy et al. to their Python 3 only version

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread Arto Jantunen
ghisv...@gmail.com writes: > On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 11:45 +0300, Arto Jantunen wrote: >> ghisv...@gmail.com writes: >> > Don't get me wrong, I am all in favour for a modern stack, >> > including >> > Python 3. >> > >> > However, upgrading NumPy et al. to their Python 3 only versions, >> > introduc

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread ghisvail
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 11:45 +0300, Arto Jantunen wrote: > ghisv...@gmail.com writes: > > Don't get me wrong, I am all in favour for a modern stack, > > including > > Python 3. > > > > However, upgrading NumPy et al. to their Python 3 only versions, > > introducing new legacy packages for Python 2,

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread ghisvail
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 10:42 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > > Let me ask you this: where is the rush to package this machine > > > learning > > > library? Could it wait after the Buster release cycle, where we > > > might > > > be in a more comfor

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread Arto Jantunen
ghisv...@gmail.com writes: > Don't get me wrong, I am all in favour for a modern stack, including > Python 3. > > However, upgrading NumPy et al. to their Python 3 only versions, > introducing new legacy packages for Python 2, and patching the large > collection of packages relying on the Python 2

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread Steffen Möller
Let me ask you this: where is the rush to package this machine learning library? Could it wait after the Buster release cycle, where we might be in a more comfortable position to upgrade matplotlib? The short answer is yes. The almost as short one is "Conda has it already, use that&

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread ghisvail
b.org/). > > > > > > Any opinions from your sides? > > How is that going to work without creating package conflicts? > > > > I suppose the main module is still named "matplotlib" not > > "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So using pyth

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread Steffen Möller
from your sides? How is that going to work without creating package conflicts? I suppose the main module is still named "matplotlib" not "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So using python3-matplotlib3 would be a breach of policy. Yes. We would need to freely interpret that

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread ghisvail
uot;? I never said that personally. > Holding back normal updates especially for science packages just > because > we don't want to use a modern numpy/scipy/matplotlib stack is not > really > friendly to our users, which (in science) rely on at least "somehow" > mo

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread Ole Streicher
cycle. If we really want to then have a Python-2-numpy, why can't there be a separate Python-2 legacy numpy source package? I do the same for astropy. Holding back normal updates especially for science packages just because we don't want to use a modern numpy/scipy/matplotlib stack is no

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread ghisvail
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 09:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:55:40AM +0100, ghisv...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > I suppose the main module is still named "matplotlib" not > > > > "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So u

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-16 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:55:40AM +0100, ghisv...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I suppose the main module is still named "matplotlib" not > > > "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So using python3-matplotlib3 > > > would > > > be a breach of pol

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-15 Thread ghisvail
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 08:46 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:30:55AM +0100, ghisv...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Any opinions from your sides? > > > > How is that going to work without creating package conflicts? > > > > I suppose the ma

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:30:55AM +0100, ghisv...@gmail.com wrote: > > Any opinions from your sides? > > How is that going to work without creating package conflicts? > > I suppose the main module is still named "matplotlib" not > "matplotlib3&quo

Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-15 Thread ghisvail
> Any opinions from your sides? How is that going to work without creating package conflicts? I suppose the main module is still named "matplotlib" not "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So using python3-matplotlib3 would be a breach of policy. Let me ask you this: where

Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?

2018-10-15 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, I am keeping me busy packaging the Orange machine learning library that seems nice (https://orange.biolab.si/#Orange-Features). Now, the test routines demand a matplotlib.pyplot module that is not in version 2 that we feature. Version 3 is the current stable release. Now, I am tempted

Re: Bug#902516: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS in buster/sid (failing tests)

2018-07-05 Thread Stuart Prescott
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 08:09:50 AEST Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > I can confirm this problem in a pbuilder environment. Unfortunately I > have no idea about the cause of the issue nor how to fix it. Any hint > from the Debian Python team? Looks a lot like at least

[Help] Re: Bug#902516: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS in buster/sid (failing tests)

2018-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
: > Package: src:python-matplotlib-venn > Version: 0.11.5-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Dear maintainer: > > I tried to build this package in buster with "dpkg-bui

Re: Suspected change in test dependencies - where is "discover" (Was: [Help] Re: Bug#884040: python-matplotlib-venn FTBFS: test failure)

2017-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:22:09PM +0200, Juhani Numminen wrote: > > In debian/rules, are the arguments to dh_auto_test still needed? The error > went > away when I removed said arguments, like so: > > override_dh_auto_test: > xvfb-run --auto-servernum --server-args="-screen 0 1024x768x24"

Re: Suspected change in test dependencies - where is "discover" (Was: [Help] Re: Bug#884040: python-matplotlib-venn FTBFS: test failure)

2017-12-15 Thread Juhani Numminen
Andreas Tille kirjoitti 12.12.2017 klo 17:10: > Hi again, > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 09:27:57AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 09:05:07PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> === warnings summary >>> === >>> None >>> [

Suspected change in test dependencies - where is "discover" (Was: [Help] Re: Bug#884040: python-matplotlib-venn FTBFS: test failure)

2017-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 09:27:57AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 09:05:07PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > === warnings summary > > === > > None > > [pytest] section in setup.cfg files is deprecated, use

[Help] Re: Bug#884040: python-matplotlib-venn FTBFS: test failure

2017-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
tom failed with: exit code=4: cp -a > README.rst > /build/1st/python-matplotlib-venn-0.11.5/.pybuild/pythonX.Y_2.7/build && cd > /build/1st/python-matplotlib-venn-0.11.5/.pybuild/pythonX.Y_2.7/build && > python2.7 /build/1st/python-matplotlib-venn-0.11.5/setup.py test &

Re: Bug#813782: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS: [failed test] Intersection with the arc along the same circle (which means infinitely many points usually) is reported as no intersection at all.

2016-02-13 Thread Konstantin Tretjakov
test suite successfully. Kind regards Andreas. On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:37:32AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: Source: python-matplotlib-venn Version: 0.11-2 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, python-matplotlib-venn fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..] running test runnin

Re: Bug#813782: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS: [failed test] Intersection with the arc along the same circle (which means infinitely many points usually) is reported as no intersection at all.

2016-02-12 Thread Andreas Tille
regards Andreas. On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:37:32AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: python-matplotlib-venn > Version: 0.11-2 > Severity: serious > > Dear Maintainer, > > python-matplotlib-venn fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: > > [..] > >

Re: Help needed: Bug#802354: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS: AttributeError: can't set attribute

2015-10-20 Thread Andreas Tille
ld && cd > > {home_dir}/build && {interpreter} /python-matplotlib-venn-0.11/setup.py > > test && rm README.rst" --dir . > > I: pybuild base:170: cp -a README.rst > > /python-matplotlib-venn-0.11/.pybuild/pythonX.Y_3.4/build && cd &

Re: Help needed: Bug#802354: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS: AttributeError: can't set attribute

2015-10-19 Thread Olivier Sallou
- > > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:05:55 +0100 > From: "Chris West (Faux)" > To: Debian Bug Tracking System > Subject: Bug#802354: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS: AttributeError: can't set > attribute > X-Debian-PR-Message: report 802354 > X-Debian-PR-Pac

Help needed: Bug#802354: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS: AttributeError: can't set attribute

2015-10-19 Thread Andreas Tille
king System Subject: Bug#802354: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS: AttributeError: can't set attribute X-Debian-PR-Message: report 802354 X-Debian-PR-Package: src:python-matplotlib-venn X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid stretch X-Debian-PR-Source: python-matplotlib-venn Source: python-matplotlib-venn

Need help python module testing at package build time: python-matplotlib-venn

2015-05-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'd like to package python-matplotlib-venn since a Debian Med package depends from this module. I injected the packaging to svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-mathplotlib-venn/trunk/ Unfortunately I'm running into: .pybuild/pythonX.Y_2.7/build/matpl

Re: Availability of Numpy, WX, Matplotlib and Scipy under Python3

2012-09-05 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 04, 2012, at 09:00 AM, Nigel Sedgwick wrote: >Given the issue with (especially) WX, I think I will stick with Python >2.7 for the time being. The only suggestion I'd make is that you write your Python 2 code so that it's easier to port to Python 3 when all your dependencies are available.

Re: Availability of Numpy, WX, Matplotlib and Scipy under Python3

2012-09-05 Thread Nigel Sedgwick
Re: Availability of Numpy, WX, Matplotlib and Scipy under Python3 = Thanks to Thomas Kluyver and Dmitrijs Ledkovs. On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 21:27 +0100, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > Python 3 versions of numpy and scipy are already in whe

Re: Availability of Numpy, WX, Matplotlib and Scipy under Python3

2012-09-03 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 3 September 2012 21:27, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > On 3 September 2012 14:57, Nigel Sedgwick wrote: >> The application makes heavy use of numpy and wx and will soon make heavy >> use of scipy, matplotlib and various other python libraries that are >>

Re: Availability of Numpy, WX, Matplotlib and Scipy under Python3

2012-09-03 Thread Thomas Kluyver
Hi Nigel, On 3 September 2012 14:57, Nigel Sedgwick wrote: > The application makes heavy use of numpy and wx and will soon make heavy > use of scipy, matplotlib and various other python libraries that are > widely used. Python 3 versions of numpy and scipy are already in wheez

Availability of Numpy, WX, Matplotlib and Scipy under Python3

2012-09-03 Thread Nigel Sedgwick
Dear All Availability of Numpy, WX, Matplotlib and Scipy under Python3 = I am a user of Debian Squeeze (6.0.5) on an AMD64 computer. I would like to switch a mainstream development of mine from Python2.6 (or 2.7) to Python3.1 (or 3.2

Re: Typo in python-matplotlib

2008-09-13 Thread Andrew Straw
Hi Tiziano. Thanks for the report. It looks like this was closed upstream a month or so ago: r5977 | mdboom | 2008-08-05 12:32:44 -0700 (Tue, 05 Aug 2008) | 2 lines Changed paths: M /trunk/matplotlib/lib/matplotlib/axes3d.py [ 2033106 ] Wrong exception raised (typo) in axes3d.py Tiziano

Re: Typo in python-matplotlib

2008-09-08 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Tiziano, On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:07, Tiziano Zito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, in the package python-matplotlib I've just hit a typo in > /usr/share/pyshared/matplotlib/axes3d.py: > > raise NotImplmentedError('axes3d is not supported in matplotlib-0.98. &g

Typo in python-matplotlib

2008-09-08 Thread Tiziano Zito
Hi, in the package python-matplotlib I've just hit a typo in /usr/share/pyshared/matplotlib/axes3d.py: raise NotImplmentedError('axes3d is not supported in matplotlib-0.98. You may want to try the 0.91.x maintenance branch') should read "NotImplementedError" instead of

Re: RFS: matplotlib 0.90.1-3

2008-02-24 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Eike Nicklas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Ondrej et al., > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I read that bug. There are more prob

Re: RFS: matplotlib 0.90.1-3

2008-02-23 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Eike Nicklas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ondrej et al., > > > > > > Yes, I read that bug. There are more problems with matplotlib - it is > > not lintian clean, > > it still uses Numerics and numarray besides numpy (I

Re: RFS: matplotlib 0.90.1-3

2008-02-23 Thread Eike Nicklas
Hi Ondrej et al., > > Yes, I read that bug. There are more problems with matplotlib - it is > not lintian clean, > it still uses Numerics and numarray besides numpy (I don't know if > this is a feature or a bug), > I think upstream deprecated Numerics and numarray and

Re: RFS: matplotlib 0.90.1-3

2008-02-23 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Eike Nicklas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:07:24 +0100 Ondrej Certik wrote: > > > > > currently, matplotlib doesn't install with numpy in sid, when numpy > > switched to gfortran and

Re: RFS: matplotlib 0.90.1-3

2008-02-23 Thread Eike Nicklas
Hi, On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:07:24 +0100 Ondrej Certik wrote: > > currently, matplotlib doesn't install with numpy in sid, when numpy > switched to gfortran and it conflicts with matplotlib. > That might also (partly) fix a bug I reassigned to matplotlib: http://bugs.d

RFS: matplotlib 0.90.1-3

2008-02-23 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, currently, matplotlib doesn't install with numpy in sid, when numpy switched to gfortran and it conflicts with matplotlib. It seems just a recompile of matplotlib fixes the problem. I imported matplotlib to DPMT svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/python-modules/packages/matplotlib/

python-matplotlib 0.62.4 && ipython 0.6.3 debian packages

2004-08-31 Thread Vittorio Palmisano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I've packaged a new version of python-matplotlib and ipython, you can find my packages at this address: deb http://anakonda.altervista.org/debian packages/ deb-src http://anakonda.altervista.org/debian sources/ # apt-get install p

python-matplotlib 0.62.4 && ipython 0.6.3 debian packages

2004-08-31 Thread redclay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I've packaged a new version of python-matplotlib and ipython, you can find my packages at this address: deb http://anakonda.altervista.org/debian packages/ deb-src http://anakonda.altervista.org/debian sources/ # apt-get install p