On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:20:22AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> G'day,
>
> just going through my old inbox messages that didn't seem to be replied
> to;
>
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 13:11, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Well, thanks! I had forgotten about this. I'm no longer sure what
prompted my que
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:46, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 23:20:22 +, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > 2) it ties you package to the particular version of python used to
> > generate the pyc files (ie, you had better have "Depends: python2.1" if
> > the .pyc's were generated
Hi,
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 23:20:22 +, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> 2) it ties you package to the particular version of python used to
> generate the pyc files (ie, you had better have "Depends: python2.1" if
> the .pyc's were generated with python 2.1)
>
That's not correct, as Python will ignore .py
G'day,
just going through my old inbox messages that didn't seem to be replied
to;
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 13:11, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've just finished my first attempt at packaging a python module.
> This module (people.debian.org/~smr/pyvtk) is purely python.
>
> I followed t
Howdy,
I've just finished my first attempt at packaging a python module.
This module (people.debian.org/~smr/pyvtk) is purely python.
I followed the "python policy" outlined in /usr/share/doc/python, and
also looked at a couple of example packages.
One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't
5 matches
Mail list logo
