Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-03-27 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 04:09:52PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: 3. Using Phillip's .egg-info solution http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel/2567 Well, since there's no progress, it's up to you as package maintainer to take the decision. The day when we have a real

Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-03-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Brian Sutherland wrote: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel/2567 [...] My opinion is that we probably shouldn't distribute eggs but we must make it possible for our users to use them. So I think that the egg meta-info ought to be distributed

Hypothetical pkg-python alioth project (was:Re: .egg in Debian summary?)

2006-03-27 Thread Carlos Galisteo
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:24:39 +0200, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, wouldn't it be time to create a pkg-python alioth project much like the pkg-perl one to globally co-maintain all the python modules ? IMHO that would be a great way to mantain python modules, and also a good

Re: Hypothetical pkg-python alioth project (was:Re: .egg in Debian summary?)

2006-03-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 01:16 +0200, Carlos Galisteo wrote: IMHO that would be a great way to mantain python modules, and also a good place for more inexperienced people (like me) to be useful by doing delegated stuff and learning from the inside. Wait...It seems there already exists a

Re: Hypothetical pkg-python alioth project

2006-03-27 Thread Gustavo Franco
Paul Wise wrote: On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 01:16 +0200, Carlos Galisteo wrote: (...) Anyone knowing about this project status? We have some packages in SVN[1] (and one package in debian). Only a few people involved[2]. We have yet to do a proper website[3], announcement and callout. (...)