On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:04:26PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:17:24PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Decorate only the shared library names with the python versions, and retain
the current names for the .a files and .so symlinks - with two separate -dev
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:04:26PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 01:15:31PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
The solution is to keep the names decorated with both python versions,
but to maintain a farm of symbolic links pointing to the current python
Le mardi 26 février 2008 à 22:04 -0600, Steve M. Robbins a écrit :
The idea is to create a single -dev package that contains the
following in /usr/lib:
libboost_python-py24-gcc42-1_34_1.so
libboost_python-py24-gcc42-1_34_1.a
libboost_python-py25-gcc42-1_34_1.so
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:43:43AM -0500, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
(I still don't see the problem: Source packages don't depend on binary
packages, only binary packages do.
Source packages *do*, in fact, depend on binary packages. Each source
package describes exactly the packages required to
4 matches
Mail list logo
