Hello,
I just uploaded a new version of python-trml2pdf where I removed myself
from Uploaders. I originally packaged this because it's needed for Satchmo
but I never went further to package satchmo. So I have no interest in this
package.
In the mean time it got one reverse dependency, namely
On 04. mai 2012 12:01, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Correct. It applies to a preview for a new upload, which is on my PC.
I just wanted to document, which changes I've applied for the
dh_pysupport - dh_python2 migration.
It's kind of hard to say without seeing the whole package, but if you
get it into
Hi!
I got some bug reports from Jakub about double build failures. I have
always found those kind of tests a bit silly, but that's just my
opinion.
Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory
that is not cleaned up by the clean target of setup.py. While
On 04/05/12 18:05, Vincent Bernat wrote:
Hi!
I got some bug reports from Jakub about double build failures. I have
always found those kind of tests a bit silly, but that's just my
opinion.
Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory
that is not
* Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org, 2012-05-04, 19:05:
I got some bug reports from Jakub about double build failures. I have
always found those kind of tests a bit silly, but that's just my
opinion.
Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory
that is not cleaned
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
or in setuptools.
Ideally, by burning it with fire.
CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and
setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it will
handle this case.
Regards,
--
On Fri, 04 May 2012, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg directory
that is not cleaned up by the clean target of setup.py. While I could
add the appropriate bits to each clean target in debian/rules, it seems
better to fix the
On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
or in setuptools.
Ideally, by burning it with fire.
CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils and
setuptools: packaging. It might be worth check with them if it
* Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com, 2012-05-04, 13:29:
Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg
directory that is not cleaned up by the clean target of setup.py.
While I could add the appropriate bits to each clean target in
debian/rules, it seems better to fix the
On Friday, May 04, 2012 06:38:30 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
or in setuptools.
Ideally, by burning it with fire.
CPython upstreams are developing a new module to replace distutils
On 04/05/12 19:04, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 06:38:30 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
On 04/05/12 18:23, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
or in setuptools.
Ideally, by burning it with fire.
CPython upstreams are
On 4 May 2012 19:06, Dmitrijs Ledkovs x...@debian.org wrote:
ok. what is the relationship between 'distribute' 'packaging'?
Let's see if I get all these right:
distutils: basic packaging functionality, part of the Python standard library
setuptools: third party module to add functionality that
On May 04, 2012, at 07:16 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
On 4 May 2012 19:06, Dmitrijs Ledkovs x...@debian.org wrote:
ok. what is the relationship between 'distribute' 'packaging'?
Let's see if I get all these right:
distutils: basic packaging functionality, part of the Python standard library
On Fri, 04 May 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com, 2012-05-04, 13:29:
Most of the time, the failures are because of the created egg
directory that is not cleaned up by the clean target of
setup.py. While I could add the appropriate bits to each clean
target
On Fri, 4 May 2012, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:24:34AM -0400, Scott Moser a écrit :
My goal would be to keep minimal changes from debian to ubuntu, and the
code there does not cause any issues that i'm aware of if there is no
readahead installed. Is there some
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 00:39 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Thomas Bechtold thomasbecht...@jpberlin.de, 2012-04-26, 06:48:
i fixed all the stuff (see comments below) and uploaded a new package
to mentors.debian.net . if there are no other issues, i'll add the
debian-dir to the python-modules svn
On 04.05.12 Andreas Noteng (andr...@noteng.no) wrote:
On 04. mai 2012 12:01, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
Correct. It applies to a preview for a new upload, which is on my PC.
I just wanted to document, which changes I've applied for the
dh_pysupport - dh_python2 migration.
It's kind of
Hello,
I had the same issue again:
how to solve pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy dependencies?
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pbuilder/+question/196073
I would appreciate your help here to make the thing flow.
Kind regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 4 May 2012 23:33, Tim Michelsen timmichel...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
how to solve pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy dependencies?
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pbuilder/+question/196073
Looking at which packages it says aren't installable, I would guess
that your pbuilder
19 matches
Mail list logo
