Re: policy question: tag format for patch-less packages

On 11/16/2016 06:07 AM, chrysn wrote: > Should git-dpm be used even though no patches are present? how do you make sure that you will never need patches? (unless this is a native package) gfmards IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: policy question: tag format for patch-less packages

On November 16, 2016 2:33:47 PM CST, "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" wrote: >On 11/16/2016 06:07 AM, chrysn wrote: >> Should git-dpm be used even though no patches are present? > >how do you make sure that you will never need patches? (unless this is >a >native package)

Re: DEP 8: Gathering Django usage analytics

Paul Wise writes: >> Should I ask on debian-devel? > > Seems reasonable. I did that here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/11/msg00252.html -- Brian May

Re: DPMT Membership request

Hi Marcos, > > My Alioth account is "mfouces-guest" do you accept our policy? (f.e. using git-dpm?) -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2

policy question: tag format for patch-less packages

Hello team, I'm confused by the DPMT policy when it comes to git-dpm usage. On the one hand, git-dpm is introduced as the patch management regime. With what I understand of what git-dpm does, this means that it is not required or even useful when packages don't need patching. On the other hand,