RE:building manpages via setup.py

2017-08-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> Simplest I can think of would be to build the extensions inplace > followed by the call to build_man. Something like: > override_dh_auto_build: > dh_auto_build > python3 setup.py build_ext --inplace > python3 setup.py build_man I do not want to build once more the ext

Re: building manpages via setup.py

2017-08-01 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel, 2017-08-01] > This pacakge contain one module with extensions (the important point) > > The new upstream version 0.14.0 provide a build_man target via the setup.py > > So in ordert to generate the doc I need to do > > python setup.py build_man > [...] > So what should

Re: building manpages via setup.py

2017-08-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 01/08/17 15:15, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: Hello, I am working on the pyfai package. This pacakge contain one module with extensions (the important point) The new upstream version 0.14.0 provide a build_man target via the setup.py So in ordert to generate the doc I need to do python

building manpages via setup.py

2017-08-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I am working on the pyfai package. This pacakge contain one module with extensions (the important point) The new upstream version 0.14.0 provide a build_man target via the setup.py So in ordert to generate the doc I need to do python setup.py build_man Now if I look at this target, I

Re: updating packages

2017-08-01 Thread Brian May
Christopher Hoskin writes: > What's the plan for moving them to unstable? Are they still using git > pq rather than git-dpm? I have updated celery to use git pq. Not done kombu or python-amqp yet however. -- Brian May

Re: updating packages

2017-08-01 Thread Christopher Hoskin
Great, thanks! What's the plan for moving them to unstable? Are they still using git pq rather than git-dpm? Christopher On 1 August 2017 at 09:22, Michael Fladischer wrote: > Hi guys, > > On 2017-07-29 12:48, Christopher Hoskin wrote: >> I was going to look at updating

Re: updating packages

2017-08-01 Thread Michael Fladischer
Hi guys, On 2017-07-29 12:48, Christopher Hoskin wrote: > I was going to look at updating vine, kombu and python-ampq this > weekend, but the upstream tarballs have been signed by a different key > pair than the one advertised at: > >