Request to join Python Modules Team
Hi there! I would like to join the Python Modules Team. For the time being I am interested in maintaining packages related to the upcoming covid biohackathon. Specifically I am trying to get my feet wet by packaging this module https://github.com/kvesteri/validators which is needed by the streamlit package. I am familiar with Debian packaging, and already have a package that builds. My salsa login is: @fancycade-guest I have read the Python Modules policy. Thanks!
Re: [RFC] python-cobra, python3-sbml5
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 06:53:55PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > >From the logs, in the last message[2] it looks like an import-error for > '_libsbml' file which corresponds to libsbml (with python3-sbml5 as a > provide) package. When I dug into looking at libsbml, I noticed that the > relevant file (libsbml.py) which throws error > is generated with swig-3.0 by the upstream [3] > > While the same file in the apt archive (observed after $apt source > python3-sbml5) seems to be generated with swig-4.0, and that's the current > swig version in Debian now. Sorry, I couldn't understand which two files are you comparing. One is from the python3-sbml5 binary package and is generated with swig 4, where is the second one, generated by swig 3? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[RFC] python-cobra, python3-sbml5
Hi, Currently python-cobra FTBFS reported here [1]. >From the logs, in the last message[2] it looks like an import-error for '_libsbml' file which corresponds to libsbml (with python3-sbml5 as a provide) package. When I dug into looking at libsbml, I noticed that the relevant file (libsbml.py) which throws error is generated with swig-3.0 by the upstream [3] While the same file in the apt archive (observed after $apt source python3-sbml5) seems to be generated with swig-4.0, and that's the current swig version in Debian now. When I compared, the one generated with swig 4.0 looks pretty different from the one generated by swig 3.0. I "suspect" that the error is due to the swig version change to 4.0, and corresponding API changes. I would really appreciate if I could have more folks "confirm" that this is the case, and I'm not missing out on anything else. I'll then file a report upstream then, asking for corresponding code changes needed for swig 4.0. [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955656 [2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955656#10 [3]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libsbml/-/blob/master/src/bindings/python/libsbml.py?expanded=true=simple Thanks and regards Nilesh
Re: Taking over DPMT (Was: python-boto: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.8 as default)
On 3/30/20 11:44 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I wonder whether we should take over python-boto into DPMT maintenance > which would enable commits to Git way more easily. I'd very much be in the favor of this, especially considering the package history. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Re: ITS: pssh
Hi Hilmar, * Hilmar Preuße [2020-03-14 08:26]: Am 14.03.2020 um 01:29 teilte Sandro Tosi mit: On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:24:13 -0700 Mo Zhou wrote: * bring it under PAPT maintenance Is there more to do than creating a source package, adding a new package below the PAPT group and import the source package into it? I did a: $ gbp import-dscs --pristine-tar --debsnap pssh and pushed it here: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/pssh * update to the latest upstream release (check #891340 or even https://github.com/ParallelSSH/parallel-ssh ?) Yes one has to do that. parallel-ssh seems to be a Python library and different code base, so I would rather go with the Github fork mentioned in #891340. But there are no new releases, so it's probably easiest to pull in the patches via debian/patches. There is a discussion to make it upstream, so I would propose to ask for a release after that is cleared: https://github.com/lilydjwg/pssh/issues/110#issuecomment-580609871 * upload to debian. Well, probably. I'd need a sponsor for initial upload as I'm just a DM. I'm happy to sponsor and help maintain as well. Do you have time later today or tomorrow to work on it together? Otherwise I will go ahead and do some cleanup. My hope would be to get a fixed version into unstable by the end of the weekend. Cheers Jochen signature.asc Description: PGP signature
