Re: Offer to help with packaging

El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió: > [] > If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the > owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP". > > If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for > #963605, and you want to

Re: Python3 -dbg packages

Hi Matthias! On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 08:33:39PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Python 3.8 upstream now has a common ABI for normal and debug extension > builds, so it is technically possible to load a debug extension in > the normal interpreter, or to load a normal extension in the debug >

Re: Timing of Python upstream and Debian releases

Hi, po 6. 7. 2020 v 21:04 odesílatel Matthias Klose napsal: > So what I'm proposing here is to aim to support 3.9 as early as possible > as a > supported Python3 version, starting with the 3.9 upstream release, and > fixing > stuff on the go. Then decide in November, if we can do the defaults

Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team]

Hi, po 6. 7. 2020 v 11:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > This isn't about hating or loving pybuild. This is all about being able > to control how this set of packages are build globally (the whole set of > packages. so you could wrap these global things around pybuild, right? -- Best