Re: Did Python 3.12 developers honestly broke special regexp sequences? (Was: hatop fails its autopkg tests with Python 3.12)

2024-02-14 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Hello Andreas, On 13/02/2024 18:21, Andreas Tille wrote: I was constantly shaking my had above bug #1061802 featuring Syntaxwarnings like SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\.' 573s CLI_INPUT_RE = re.compile('[a-zA-Z0-9_:\.\-\+; /#%]') 573s /tmp/autopkgtest.G4v4eK/autopkgtest_tmp/hatop.p

How to provide AppStream data by upstream?

2024-02-14 Thread c . buhtz
Hello, imagine an upstream project providing an AppStream data file (foobar.metainfo.xml) and it is a full qualified Python project using state of the art build system (pyproject.toml, setuptools or something similiar, src-layout). Should the foobar.metainfo.xml file be a part of the upstrea

Re: How to provide AppStream data by upstream?

2024-02-14 Thread Soren Stoutner
I don’t know if this would be considered the best way to do it, but with electrum I simply handle the AppStream file manually in electrum.install. https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/blob/master/debian/electrum.install? ref_type=heads[1] In this case I wrote the AppStream file m

Spinx help needed

2024-02-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Hi, I pushed fixes for #1056419 and #1058311 to Git and I think should be fixed as well. The only remaining build problem is new and caused by sphinx[1]: dh_sphinxdoc -i -O--buildsystem=pybuild dh_sphinxdoc: error: debian/python-lmfit-doc/usr/share/doc/python3-lmfit/