On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:58:25PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
The only problem is when someone with write access to
/usr/lib/site-python uses a non-default python... the pyc's will be
updated for the non-default python.
After testing, it seems that there is no way to prevent root from
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:58:25PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
Anyone else agree?
I see no problem, aside from performance for those users not using the
default version, but since this is only a load time problem, it
shouldn't be more than a little annoyance. I suppose that really picky
users
Hi,
why isn't there a default /usr/include/python (possibly accomplished as
a symlink in the package python-dev, like /usr/bin/python in the package
python)? (I'm sure there is a reason for that, I just didn't find it
documented somewhere.)
Thanks!
bye,
Roland
signature.asc
Description:
Roland Stigge writes:
Hi,
why isn't there a default /usr/include/python (possibly accomplished as
a symlink in the package python-dev, like /usr/bin/python in the package
python)? (I'm sure there is a reason for that, I just didn't find it
documented somewhere.)
it's not needed. distutils
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 18:44, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:58:25PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
[...]
Python applications using the default Python with their own modules not
in /usr/lib/site-python... not an issue?
Actually... I think I prefer
i agree, we have a great support for Python.
thanks to those who make it possible.
cavok
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:47:48AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
...
Personally I was going to post nice job everyone... the Python Policy
looks like it is working. There are still a few niggly things,
6 matches
Mail list logo