Re: version independent pythin packages: ?

2003-08-07 Thread Alexandre Fayolle
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:58:25PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: The only problem is when someone with write access to /usr/lib/site-python uses a non-default python... the pyc's will be updated for the non-default python. After testing, it seems that there is no way to prevent root from

Re: version independent pythin packages: ?

2003-08-07 Thread Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:58:25PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: Anyone else agree? I see no problem, aside from performance for those users not using the default version, but since this is only a load time problem, it shouldn't be more than a little annoyance. I suppose that really picky users

/usr/include/python

2003-08-07 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi, why isn't there a default /usr/include/python (possibly accomplished as a symlink in the package python-dev, like /usr/bin/python in the package python)? (I'm sure there is a reason for that, I just didn't find it documented somewhere.) Thanks! bye, Roland signature.asc Description:

Re: /usr/include/python

2003-08-07 Thread Matthias Klose
Roland Stigge writes: Hi, why isn't there a default /usr/include/python (possibly accomplished as a symlink in the package python-dev, like /usr/bin/python in the package python)? (I'm sure there is a reason for that, I just didn't find it documented somewhere.) it's not needed. distutils

Re: version independent pythin packages: ?

2003-08-07 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 18:44, Alexandre Fayolle wrote: On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:58:25PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: [...] Python applications using the default Python with their own modules not in /usr/lib/site-python... not an issue? Actually... I think I prefer

Re: python 2.2 - python 2.3 transition

2003-08-07 Thread Domenico Andreoli
i agree, we have a great support for Python. thanks to those who make it possible. cavok On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:47:48AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: ... Personally I was going to post nice job everyone... the Python Policy looks like it is working. There are still a few niggly things,