Re: lintian troubles and .changes doubts

2009-09-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
 Alessandro Dentella san...@e-den.it (03/09/2009):
 Hi,
 
 Hello,
 
   I'm trying to produce the python-sqlkit package. I'm both the upsteam
   author and the mantainer. I have /debian folder in original package. I
   recently read is not recommended but I found easier to manage to have it
   in the same mercurial repo. I have several questions:

You'll have to change that in case you want to get the package into debian.



 release version
 ---

   The .deb was lintian clean on rel 0.8.6-rc5, then I did 'dch -v 0.8.6' and
   dch required -b option as felt 0.8.6-rc5 was grater than 0.8.6.
 
 it is. You should have used “0.8.6~rc5”, which sorts lower than
 “0.8.6”, while “0.8.6-rc5” sorts higher.

dpkg --compare-versions is helpful here, if you don't know the details :)


-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
   ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: lintian troubles ... almost done

2009-09-03 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/9/3 Alessandro Dentella san...@e-den.it:
  bad-distribution-in-changes-file
  
 
    If I run lintian on .changes it complains
    bad-distribution-in-changes-file but I'm unsure on what I should do.
    At present I'm building on an ubuntu-hardy so the name gets written in
    the changelog. There is nothing peculiar of one distro or another so I'm
    unsure what I should write.

 Not sure about Ubuntu, but for Debian, that'd always be “unstable”
 (unless you're uploading to another suite of course, but that's
 another story).

 fine thanks. I tryied 'sid', but that's clearly not accepted.


For debian valid once are: experimental  unstable (there others but
they are not needed usually). And in general packages get uploaded to
unstable.

For ubuntu you should use the adjectives of a release eg karmic jaunty
etc. for eg ppa uploads.


 Last question
 -

 When testing creating the package from my newly created sources on a newer
 machine (ubuntu 9.04), lintian complained:

 W: python-sqlkit: embedded-javascript-library
     usr/share/doc/python-sqlkit/html/_static/jquery.js

 That's clearly the jquery of the sphinx documentation. It's introduced in
 the upstream package when sphinx compile the docs (not at my build time).

 Is it mecessary to fix this or I can just leave it as is (it appears as a
 warning, not an error).


Imho documentation should be build (rebuild) at deb package building stage.


 thanks again
 sandro
 *:-)


 --
 Sandro Dentella  *:-)
 http://sqlkit.argolinux.org        SQLkit home page - PyGTK/python/sqlalchemy


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org





-- 
With best regards


Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Menu entries not appearing

2009-09-03 Thread Alessandro Dentella
Hi,

  I tried to add a menu entry for application 'sqledit', but the entry does not
  appear if I use standard menu entry in debian as:

?package(python-sqlkit):needs=X11 section=Applications/Office\
  title=sqledit command=/usr/bin/sqledit

  it gets placed in /usr/share/menu/python-sqlkit but it does not show in the
  menu. In postinst scipt I correctly see:

if [ $1 = configure ]  [ -x `which update-menus 2/dev/null` ]; then
update-menus
fi

  It *does* appear correctly if I place a sqlkit.desktop in
  /usr/share/applications. 

  I'm doing something wrong with the menu entry?
  Is it ok to use only sqlkit.desktop?

  thanks again

  sandro
  *:-)



-- 
Sandro Dentella  *:-)
http://sqlkit.argolinux.orgSQLkit home page - PyGTK/python/sqlalchemy


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Menu entries not appearing

2009-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
Please use debian-mentors for general questions. follow up there

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 13:42, Alessandro Dentellasan...@e-den.it wrote:
 Hi,

  I tried to add a menu entry for application 'sqledit', but the entry does not
  appear if I use standard menu entry in debian as:

 ?package(python-sqlkit):needs=X11 section=Applications/Office\
  title=sqledit command=/usr/bin/sqledit

  it gets placed in /usr/share/menu/python-sqlkit but it does not show in the
  menu. In postinst scipt I correctly see:

    if [ $1 = configure ]  [ -x `which update-menus 2/dev/null` ]; 
 then
            update-menus
    fi

  It *does* appear correctly if I place a sqlkit.desktop in
  /usr/share/applications.

  I'm doing something wrong with the menu entry?
  Is it ok to use only sqlkit.desktop?

  thanks again

  sandro
  *:-)



 --
 Sandro Dentella  *:-)
 http://sqlkit.argolinux.org        SQLkit home page - PyGTK/python/sqlalchemy


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org





-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: wtop (python-app)

2009-09-03 Thread Mauro Lizaur
Hello people,

I'd like to know if any of you could sponsor/take a look at this top-like 
app which parses Apache's log to analyze the stats of a server.
BTW, I've chosen 'experimental' as the distribution for this package 
basically because when I was testing this package I had little or no
significant results, I believe it's due to my low (localhost) traffic,
so I prefer to encourage people to test it and if it works fine, move it 
to unstable.

This would close #486749 [0]

I've uploaded it to PAPT SVN:
 svn://svn.debian.org/python-apps/packages/wtop/trunk/
and to mentors.d.n:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wtop/wtop_0.6.3-1.dsc


[0] http://bugs.debian.org/486749

Saludos,
Mauro

--
JID: lavaram...@jabber.org | http://lizaur.github.com/
2B82 A38D 1BA5 847A A74D 6C34 6AB7 9ED6 C8FD F9C1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: transmissionrpc (fixed)

2009-09-03 Thread Luca Falavigna
Timur Birsh t...@linukz.org ha scritto:
  debian/control:
  * You probably miss a dependency on transmission.
 
 I think Suggests dependency on transmission-daemon is a better choice?

Is module useful without transmission-daemon (or transmission)? I think
it should be put into Recommends at least.

Some other issues:

* Upstream tarball is packed in a strange way. I use
uscan --force-download --repack doeproduce
  and I'm unable to obtain a regular .orig.tar.gz. Can this be solved?

* debian/docs: No need to include README.source in .deb file.

* debian/rules: use install -Dm 755 instead of cp, so you can also set
  permissions to have a working executable, this let you removing
  dirs file too.

* debian/rules: remove unused helper calls (such as dh_link).

* [COSMETIC] Remove useless comments in your patches to keep it minimal:
 #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
 ## 01_setup.dpatch by Timur Birsh t...@linukz.org
 ## DP: Use distutils

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
 `.  `'
   `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: RFS: transmissionrpc (fixed)

2009-09-03 Thread Timur Birsh
Luca Falavigna wrote:

 Is module useful without transmission-daemon (or transmission)? I think
 it should be put into Recommends at least.

OK. I've put it into Recommends.

 Some other issues:
 
 * Upstream tarball is packed in a strange way. I use
 uscan --force-download --repack doeproduce
   and I'm unable to obtain a regular .orig.tar.gz. Can this be solved?

I've fixed debian/watch to look for .zip archives. In this case .orig.tar.gz 
downloads correctly.

 * debian/docs: No need to include README.source in .deb file.

Fixed.

 * debian/rules: use install -Dm 755 instead of cp, so you can also set
   permissions to have a working executable, this let you removing
   dirs file too.

Fixed.

 * debian/rules: remove unused helper calls (such as dh_link).

Fixed.

 * [COSMETIC] Remove useless comments in your patches to keep it minimal:
  #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
  ## 01_setup.dpatch by Timur Birsh t...@linukz.org
  ## DP: Use distutils

Fixed.

Please find fixed package at [1].

1. 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/transmissionrpc/transmissionrpc_0.3-1.dsc

Thanks,
-- 
Timur


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org