* Vincent Bernat , 2011-06-15, 07:31:
On the debian side I always have to copy-paste the same-looking code
over and over again (symlink jquery,
If you use dh_link in your debian/rules (most likely you do), you need
only a single line in debian/.links to do that.
Don't you need to remove jque
On 06/15/2011 09:47 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Should I put the extension build for the debug interpreter into the
> normal python-xx package, or into the python-xx-dbg package that also
> contains the debugging symbols?
>
> The first variant seems to be more common, but I'm having trouble to
> co
Le mercredi 15 juin 2011 à 15:47 -0400, Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
> Should I put the extension build for the debug interpreter into the
> normal python-xx package, or into the python-xx-dbg package that also
> contains the debugging symbols?
It should definitely go into python-xx-dbg.
> The first
Hello,
Should I put the extension build for the debug interpreter into the
normal python-xx package, or into the python-xx-dbg package that also
contains the debugging symbols?
The first variant seems to be more common, but I'm having trouble to
come up with a good pattern for debian/xx.install t
On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>it is fine and it is useful... as a submodule, not as a top-level module
Agreed! I think I get what you're driving at now. Some applications don't
put their Python code or tests in a package. In those cases, yes by all means
a private packa
Le 15/06/2011 10:18, Zygmunt Krynicki a écrit :
> W dniu 15.06.2011 03:28, Ben Finney pisze:
If we are talking from a perspective of upstream developers that
also maintain their packages then I would *love* to see setup.py
sdist-test and would use it each day.
>>>
>>> ;-)
>>
>> How w
Hi,
[Barry Warsaw]
> [Zygmunt Krynicki]
>> Can please we have standardized hooks to build sphinx documentation and run
>> setup.py test tests?
> I'd like to see the packaging folks address this. Eric is subscribed to this
> list and can probably speak to packaging's take on it, but my preferences
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18:25AM +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> W dniu 15.06.2011 03:28, Ben Finney pisze:
>
> >>>If we are talking from a perspective of upstream developers that
> >>>also maintain their packages then I would *love* to see setup.py
> >>>sdist-test and would use it each day.
>
W dniu 15.06.2011 03:28, Ben Finney pisze:
If we are talking from a perspective of upstream developers that
also maintain their packages then I would *love* to see setup.py
sdist-test and would use it each day.
;-)
How would a putative ‘sdist_test’ differ from ‘test’? Why is this an
argument
9 matches
Mail list logo
