Re: Possible misbuilt python3 module packages

2012-03-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:02:42 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > Last night I uploaded an updated python3-defaults package to fix a problem > where dh_python3 was not honoring version requirements set the -V option in > debian/rules or X-Python3-Version in debian/control. > > If you have a python3

Re: Numpy & dh_python2

2012-03-16 Thread Matthias Klose
On 16.03.2012 14:29, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Matthias Klose , 2012-03-16, 13:36: re-adding myself as an uploader, apparently silently removed. Well, from my IRC log (2011-08-27): 22:43 < jwilk> morph_: Out of interest, did you ask the former Numpy co-maintainers if they are ok with removing them

RFC: Adding discussion about required versions to Python policy

2012-03-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
I've worked on a couple of dh_python3 bugs in the last few days and as a result, gotten my hands dirty on the Python 3 dependency generation code. This caused me to consider the question of specifying which Python 3 versions are supported by a package a little more closely. I have generally con

Re: Numpy & dh_python2

2012-03-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 15:05, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Well, before I can say anything more I'll have to get my hands dirty. that I'm doing right away; I've committed your diff as you sent, and I'm working on polishing it a bit, something including: - include dirs for py3k - f2py for py3k - tests a

Removing legacy XS-Python-Version support from python3-defaults

2012-03-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
When Squeeze was nearing freeze, the definition of some aspects of python3 support were still new. There were some packages that used XS-Python-Version in debian control, instead of X-Python3-Version. There are now none (one package still has it in debian/control, but it's not actually used

Re: Numpy & dh_python2

2012-03-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 14:38, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 16 March 2012 13:35, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Thanks a lot for your work! I just gave it a quick look (i.e. reading >> the patch) and it seems that would work (at least for the packaging >> part). It would be also nice if you could post your

Re: Numpy & dh_python2

2012-03-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Thomas, On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 02:15, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > After some trial and error, I've got it building python3-numpy > (leaving python-support in place for Python 2) - a patch is attached. > I've checked that I can install and import the built package. > > Changes and suggestions are

Re: Numpy & dh_python2

2012-03-16 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 16 March 2012 13:35, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Thanks a lot for your work! I just gave it a quick look (i.e. reading > the patch) and it seems that would work (at least for the packaging > part). It would be also nice if you could post your patch at > 601...@bugs.debian.org, so also the BTS will be

Re: Numpy & dh_python2

2012-03-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 13:36, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 16.03.2012 02:15, Thomas Kluyver wrote: >> >> After some trial and error, I've got it building python3-numpy >> (leaving python-support in place for Python 2) - a patch is attached. >> I've checked that I can install and import the built pa

Re: Numpy & dh_python2

2012-03-16 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Matthias Klose , 2012-03-16, 13:36: re-adding myself as an uploader, apparently silently removed. Well, from my IRC log (2011-08-27): 22:43 < jwilk> morph_: Out of interest, did you ask the former Numpy co-maintainers if they are ok with removing them from Uploaders? :> 22:43 < morph_> jwil

Re: Numpy & dh_python2

2012-03-16 Thread Matthias Klose
On 16.03.2012 02:15, Thomas Kluyver wrote: After some trial and error, I've got it building python3-numpy (leaving python-support in place for Python 2) - a patch is attached. I've checked that I can install and import the built package. Changes and suggestions are welcome, and I expect there ar