On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:36:58AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Allow me be blunt then: do we have volunteers to maintain the pythonX.Y
> packages? Can those volunteers manifest themselves on this list?
> I understand there might be incompatibilities that make impossible for
> potential volu
Lintian now emits:
W: python-unicodecsv source: debhelper-overrides-need-versioned-build-depends
(>= 7.0.50~)
I: python-unicodecsv source: quilt-patch-missing-description
01disable_float_double_tests.diff
* Thomas Bechtold , 2012-04-23, 18:32:
Please run tests at build time.
fixed in debian/r
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:52 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Thomas Bechtold , 2012-04-23, 17:34:
> >>Please run tests at build time.
> >fixed in debian/rules
>
> It should be override_dh_auto_test, not overwrite_dh_auto_test.
> Please honour DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck.
fixed both on mentors.debian.ne
* Thomas Bechtold , 2012-04-23, 17:34:
Please run tests at build time.
fixed in debian/rules
It should be override_dh_auto_test, not overwrite_dh_auto_test.
Please honour DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck.
Please test against all supported Python versions, not only the default
one.
--
Jakub Wilk
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:49 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
i fixed most of the comments and uploaded a new version to
mentors.debian.net . see comments below
> "debhelper (>= 7.0.50)" - I think this could be simply "(>= 7)", I don't
> see anything in your package that would require 7.0.50.
fixed in d
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Thomas Bechtold , 2012-04-22, 14:16:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-unicodecsv/python-unicodecsv_0.9.0-1.dsc
"debhelper (>= 7.0.50)" - I think this could be simply "(>= 7)", I don't
see anything in your package that would requir
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:32 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Thomas Bechtold, 2012-04-22]
> > The package is a drop-in replacement for python2 csv module. There's a
> > RFP bug #669678 [2].
>
> If you plan to maintain it, please rename the bug to ITP and set yourself
> as bug owner
done.
> > I w
* Yaroslav Halchenko , 2012-04-23, 09:17:
The “failures” was caused by the following misfeature of the
specification: “if a test […] prints to stderr, it is considered to
have failed.” But nosetests does print stuff to stderr even if
everything is all right (see bug #460242).
yikes -- doesn't i
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Maybe it was not a good example after all. :) I just realized that,
> according to adt-run, the tests were failed. I didn't notice this
> before because there was nothing at the end of adt-run's output that
> would indicate that something went awry.
> The
* Jakub Wilk , 2012-04-22, 10:03:
would you also mind pointing to the 'best of the breed' package fro
which you have created an autopkgtest pkg?
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/gamera/trunk/debian/tests/
Maybe it was not a good example after all. :) I just realized th
[Thomas Bechtold, 2012-04-22]
> The package is a drop-in replacement for python2 csv module. There's a
> RFP bug #669678 [2].
If you plan to maintain it, please rename the bug to ITP and set yourself
as bug owner
> I would be happy if the package could be managed by
> the Python Modules Packaging
11 matches
Mail list logo
