Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Review and sponsoring request: pymia (Python module)

Hello, On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:44 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Andreas Tille , 2013-12-10, 13:17: > >On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:41:38PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > [...] > >>I have one reservation about multi-arch support: Is a python *.so > >>module considered a shared library in the sense tha

Re: Review and sponsoring request: pymia (Python module)

* Andreas Tille , 2013-12-10, 13:17: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:41:38PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: [...] I have one reservation about multi-arch support: Is a python *.so module considered a shared library in the sense that I should add Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}? No, it's not. (In fac

Re: Review and sponsoring request: pymia (Python module)

Hi Gert, On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:41:38PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > I've prepared the new package 'pymia' to close the ITP #694439. I've > seen that the package python-mia has already been added to the > debian-med:imaging-development task :). There is also the python 3 > version "python3-mia

Disappearing egg-info

egg-info for "distribute" and "pil" has disappeared recently. But there are existing packages referencing these projects names in their requires.txt: glue-sprite_0.3-1_all/usr/share/pyshared/glue-0.3.egg-info/requires.txt:PIL==1.1.7 keysync_0.2-2_all/usr/share/pyshared/keysync-0.2.egg-info/requ

Re: Recommending get-orig-source for packages ?

Le Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 05:35:08PM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : > > By my reading of ‘copyright-format/1.0’ (the “Machine-readable > debian/copyright file” specification), the normative place for that > information is the “Source” field: > > Source > > Formatted text, no synopsis: an