Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 19:25 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote: > Because the way Python packaging currently is and historically has > been, binary packages are not something that is widely available or > viable. Hmm, I thought eggs have been around for ages (seems about 8 years)? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 01:24:46 PM Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 22:19:20 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I have the python3-defaults upload to enable python3.5 as a supported > > python3 version prepared and ready to upload when I get an ack from the > > release team. > ack. > > Cheers, > Julien Thanks. I've uploaded python3-defaults, so once it's built/installed python3.5 is supported. Scott K signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules
On September 26, 2015 at 5:30:35 AM, Paul Wise (p...@debian.org) wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 19:25 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote: > > > Because the way Python packaging currently is and historically has > > been, binary packages are not something that is widely available or > > viable. > > Hmm, I thought eggs have been around for ages (seems about 8 years)? > Eggs are problematic and hardly anyone publishes them. - Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
