Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On September 29, 2015 7:55:36 AM EDT, Julien Cristau wrote: >On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:26:44 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Once again, the python policy about Maintainer/Uploaders has been >ignored >> >>

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >Once again, the python policy about Maintainer/Uploaders has been ignored > >either policy changes or this has to stop at some point. A few observations. The policy should perhaps be better promoted or more explicitly written. The links you

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Sandro Tosi, 2015-09-29] > Once again, the python policy about Maintainer/Uploaders has been ignored > > http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html#maintainership > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin > > either policy changes or this has to stop at

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Sandro Tosi
Once again, the python policy about Maintainer/Uploaders has been ignored http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html#maintainership https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin either policy changes or this has to stop at some point. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at

Bug#800437: ITP: python-sievelib -- Client-side Sieve and Managesieve library

2015-09-29 Thread Michael Fladischer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Fladischer -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: python-sievelib Version : 0.8 Upstream Author : Antoine Nguyen * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sievelib

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:26:44 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Once again, the python policy about Maintainer/Uploaders has been ignored > > http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html#maintainership > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin > > either

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Sandro Tosi
> OTOH, this is experimental. It's not like this upload has any effect on > anyone except to let Thomas work on packages that depend on it. still the policy defines a set of rules that apply to any debian suites, or are you suggesting that experimental is not cover by those rules and we could do

Maintainer vs. Uploaders

2015-09-29 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Barry Warsaw, 2015-09-29] > How should the change be acknowledged by the > maintainer? Should I Cc the mailing list when I contact the maintainer? Is do we really need a written policy how to contact fellow co-maintainer? Ping on IRC, send an email, send a message via xmpp or phone, ... use

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le mardi 29 sept. 2015 à 09:48:16 (-0400), Barry Warsaw a écrit : > On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > >Once again, the python policy about Maintainer/Uploaders has been ignored > > > >either policy changes or this has to stop at some point. > > A few observations. > >

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 29, 2015, at 02:02 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote: >After reading this thread, I feel like I should go through all of my >packages and remove the team from Maintainer for all of them. I try very >hard to respond promptly to pings (bugs, email, IRC, ...) about my >packages, even if it's just

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Tristan Seligmann
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 at 15:48 Barry Warsaw wrote: > The wiki says that the general rule of thumb is to set the team as > Maintainer, > to which I agree. I may not have been as deliberate about my own > packages, so > I plan on reviewing them, and will fix any that aren't

git migration (AKA missing old good svn days)

2015-09-29 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Barry Warsaw, 2015-09-29] > On Sep 29, 2015, at 09:46 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > >(and remember to remove DPMT from debian/control if it's not in SVN ;P) > > Given that the final git migration is imminent (really! otherwise I'm going to > scream ;), can we not force people to go through

Re: git migration (AKA missing old good svn days)

2015-09-29 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 29 septembre 2015 23:05 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski  : >> Yes, let's discourage any new packages from manually migrating or starting >> out >> in git just until flag day. But I'm not sure it's worth removing DPMT on >> existing repos just to add it back, hopefully RSN. > > we

Re: lintian and team uploads

2015-09-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:31:23 PM Julien Puydt wrote: > Le mardi 29 sept. 2015 à 15:51:44 (-0400), Barry Warsaw a écrit : > > On Sep 29, 2015, at 09:46 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > >(and remember to remove DPMT from debian/control if it's not in SVN ;P) > > > > Given that the final git

Re: Maintainer vs. Uploaders

2015-09-29 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 29, 2015, at 04:30 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >Maintainer vs Uploaders rules needs to be moved to policy. I will >propose a patch to the policy soon (I'd prefer a native speaker to do >it, though) +1, and I'd be happy to review the specific text. Cheers, -Barry

Re: Suggestion for recommended build tools a python application

2015-09-29 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le mercredi 30 sept. 2015 à 00:17:32 (+0600), Titon Barua a écrit : > I found some online resource where someone suggested using autotools for > building GTK+python applications. I can definitely go that route, but how > would it affect packaging for debian? How am I supposed to specify the >

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Barry Warsaw, 2015-09-29] > On Sep 29, 2015, at 05:40 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > > >- I want lintian not to bug me about NMU ; > > This one's easy. Just put "Team upload" in the changelog (e.g. `dch --team`). it's even easier than that... add yourself to Uploaders (you're maintaining it after

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-29 Thread Julien Puydt
Le mardi 29 sept. 2015 à 20:40:11 (+0200), Piotr Ożarowski a écrit : > [Barry Warsaw, 2015-09-29] > > On Sep 29, 2015, at 05:40 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > > > > >- I want lintian not to bug me about NMU ; > > > > This one's easy. Just put "Team upload" in the changelog (e.g. `dch > > --team`).

Suggestion for recommended build tools a python application

2015-09-29 Thread Titon Barua
Hi, I am developing a plugin for IBus, written in python3. The project depends on some other python modules and system packages, like python3-gi, gir1.2-ibus-1.0 etc. Also, it needs to install data files to the system ( inside /usr/lib/ibus/component/) to make itself available to IBus. I am a

Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported

2015-09-29 Thread Tomasz Rybak
Dnia 2015-09-27, nie o godzinie 10:28 -0400, Scott Kitterman pisze: [ cut ] > Yes. They have started. I think we're about a third of the way > through Dependency level 1. Numpy is in Dependency level 5, so this > is not unexpected for now. You can follow the progress in the > transition

lintian and team uploads

2015-09-29 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Julien Puydt, 2015-09-29] > Yes, that's what I said: I put myself as uploaders so lintian > doesn't bug me about NMU. my guess¹ is that you used different name/email in debian/control and debian/changelog [¹] and it's the last one, include pointer to sources next time (and remember to

Re: lintian and team uploads

2015-09-29 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Sep 29, 2015, at 09:46 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >(and remember to remove DPMT from debian/control if it's not in SVN ;P) Given that the final git migration is imminent (really! otherwise I'm going to scream ;), can we not force people to go through this churn right now? Yes, let's

Re: lintian and team uploads

2015-09-29 Thread Julien Puydt
Le mardi 29 sept. 2015 à 15:51:44 (-0400), Barry Warsaw a écrit : > On Sep 29, 2015, at 09:46 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > >(and remember to remove DPMT from debian/control if it's not in SVN ;P) > > Given that the final git migration is imminent (really! otherwise I'm going to > scream ;),