Re: Package name for github.com/miguelgrinberg/python-socketio

2016-08-02 Thread Luke Yeager
FYI I did a little searching and realized this has been discussed before. Sorry - I'm new to these old-style mailing lists. https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2016/03/msg00074.html On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:34

Re: Package name for github.com/miguelgrinberg/python-socketio

2016-08-02 Thread John Mark Vandenberg
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Luke Yeager wrote: > I'd like to make a debian package for this repo: > https://github.com/miguelgrinberg/python-socketio It is only a year old, so maybe they would be open to the idea they should pick a more unique name now.

Re: Package name for github.com/miguelgrinberg/python-socketio

2016-08-02 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 03 Aug 2016 at 09:12:22 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Yes, this is a problem with the current Debian Python policy: it assumes > distribution authors will not collide on package names. > > I don't have an answer, though I will point out that whatever the > solution is, it will be

Re: Package name for github.com/miguelgrinberg/python-socketio

2016-08-02 Thread Ben Finney
Luke Yeager writes: > The policy manual says the package name should be "python-socketio" > since I want to create a python2 package that provides the "socketio" > module. > > But that name is already taken by this project: > https://github.com/abourget/gevent-socketio

Package name for github.com/miguelgrinberg/python-socketio

2016-08-02 Thread Luke Yeager
I'd like to make a debian package for this repo: https://github.com/miguelgrinberg/python-socketio The policy manual says the package name should be "python-socketio" since I want to create a python2 package that provides the "socketio" module. But that name is already taken by this project:

Re: voluptuous in DPMT

2016-08-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 02, 2016, at 11:35 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >I need voluptuous for OpenStack. So unless someone needs the version in >Unstable, I prefer to not risk to break anything, and upload updates to >Experimental, just in case the new version breaks something in the older >release of OpenStack. My

Re: voluptuous in DPMT

2016-08-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 08/02/2016 07:54 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Thomas, what's going on with the voluptuous package? > > I'm looking at starting to use it for a project and I noticed that it was > pretty out of date (the current upstream is 0.9.2). So I gbp cloned the DPMT > git-dpm repo and started to hack on

Re: voluptuous in DPMT

2016-08-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 02, 2016, at 01:54 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >You won't mind if I upload 0.9.2? I'll try to merge your changes in, but >I've yet to see how easy that will be. Not too bad actually. I think I have it all prepped and ready to go in DPMT git. Cheers, -Barry pgpsyaBqHgRCL.pgp Description:

voluptuous in DPMT

2016-08-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
Thomas, what's going on with the voluptuous package? I'm looking at starting to use it for a project and I noticed that it was pretty out of date (the current upstream is 0.9.2). So I gbp cloned the DPMT git-dpm repo and started to hack on it. The last upload appeared to be 0.8.2-1 by Robert S.