As for this particular issue -- I think I have complained upstream and
it was addressed: https://github.com/joblib/joblib/issues/428 I will now
see to build/upload current upstream snapshot -- codebase seems largely
in maintenance mode ATM
On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Andreas Tille wrote:
On December 7, 2016 6:09:56 AM EST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>I just want to make some noise amongst Python experts about bug
>I admit I have no idea - but since there was no response for 10 days
>several packages git a testing removal notice.
I just want to make some noise amongst Python experts about bug #846228.
I admit I have no idea - but since there was no response for 10 days now
several packages git a testing removal notice.
I think python-joblib has several rdepends and thus it would IMHO be
better maintained in
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Raphael, do you think that the upstream Django project might be willing to
> make some kind of best practices for naming third party django packages? If
> they did that, then that would give us a basis for Debian maintainers talking
> to their
Mail list logo