Re: Bug#846228: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance

2016-12-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
As for this particular issue -- I think I have complained upstream and it was addressed: https://github.com/joblib/joblib/issues/428 I will now see to build/upload current upstream snapshot -- codebase seems largely in maintenance mode ATM On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi

Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance

2016-12-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On December 7, 2016 6:09:56 AM EST, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Yaroslav, > >I just want to make some noise amongst Python experts about bug >#846228. >I admit I have no idea - but since there was no response for 10 days >now >several packages git a testing removal notice. > >I

Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance

2016-12-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Yaroslav, I just want to make some noise amongst Python experts about bug #846228. I admit I have no idea - but since there was no response for 10 days now several packages git a testing removal notice. I think python-joblib has several rdepends and thus it would IMHO be better maintained in

Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages

2016-12-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Raphael, do you think that the upstream Django project might be willing to > make some kind of best practices for naming third party django packages? If > they did that, then that would give us a basis for Debian maintainers talking > to their